Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Miguel Angel Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jul 28, 2009.


  1. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    Barrera and Hatton weren't prime.

    Diaz:lol:

    I already address the Marquez fight.
     
  2. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Barrera and Hatton WERE in the prime. How can you say there not?? Just cause Hatton lost to the great Mayweather doesnt mean he isnt in his prime, and Barrera had the damn ring belt FOOL!!! Know what you're talking about before you go yapping.
     
  3. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    WTF! Ring Champs Barrera and Hatton not on their prime when PAC fought them? You got it wrong dude...
    .
     
  4. JML

    JML Active Member Full Member

    554
    0
    Sep 21, 2009
    Hatton was and is well past his best he never the same after mayweather fight
     
  5. JML

    JML Active Member Full Member

    554
    0
    Sep 21, 2009
    If you wanna win Firepower or Latin Fury 12 prizes follow @trboxing on Twitter. Look out for any competions including #LF12Gloves and #Firepower. Good luck
     
  6. Breakdown

    Breakdown Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,894
    0
    Nov 24, 2008
    Nope... unless he use plasters
     
  7. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    Well you can always tell the people on this forum what's your assessment of the November 2003 version of Barrera and the January 2006 version of Erik Morales... That's if you are brave enough to present your opinion here...;)
    .
     
  8. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    If Cotto doesn't solve the speed issue quickly, he will be obliterated a la Hatton.

    That said, Cotto's timing is so good that he has a chance to deal with the speed factor. And, he's a lot bigger.

    I still think Pac's going to roll but it will be interesting. If Cotto hits Pac right, then Pac will have big problems.
     
  9. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    so what pac turned pro at 16 and is in his prime now at 30. people need to stop making excuses for fighters that lose. pac beat a prime barrera that just beat hamed, morales, tapia and kelly.

    stop hating people.
     
  10. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    If Cotto follows these two fighters game plan when they fought PacCotto win by either a chin or body shot:
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDSHS9i48Vk"]
    This content is protected
    [/ame]




    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0spkKaucBus[/ame]
     
  11. triplehknls

    triplehknls New Member Full Member

    78
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    PAC will be the one receiving the worst beating ever.
    Cotto via TKO 7. Roach will throw in the towel.

    This content is protected
     
  12. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    :huh:huh:huh

    where's cotto in that pic?
     
  13. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    I'm definately going with Cotto in this one. Pacs performances against DLh and Hatton were both exceptional, based on solid gameplans and unbeleivable speed. The one concern i have for Cotto is his average head movement against the blistering speed of Pac. However if Cotto keeps his guard up, unlike Hatton, and makes weight comfortably, unlike DLH, id expect Cotto to take it to the later rounds where his punches should start to have an effect.
     
  14. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    And?

    Hopkins had the ring belt at 42 years old. So winning the ring belt reverses the effects of life and automatically makes you prime again?:huh

    I think you got it wrong, dude, but you probably already know that.:hey
     
  15. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    No he wasn't lucky...He actually followed through with his gameplan...I HAD IT 7-4-1 EVEN WITH THE FLOYD OSCAR FIGHT 116-113....YOU WILL SEE THAT THE PRESS AND 2 OF THE 3 JUDGES AGREED WITH ME..LUCK HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT...