How would you define the boxing year of 2009 so far?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boom_Boom, Jul 18, 2009.


  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    Now Linares

    theres only 2 and a half months left


    Next ones to lose Dirrell and Ward
     
  2. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,422
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    The year Super Six kicked off.
     
  3. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    Terrible with all of the deaths.
     
  4. TonyPeri

    TonyPeri Active Member Full Member

    736
    0
    May 22, 2008
    Agreed. I think it's the future of boxing.
     
  5. dmoney5787

    dmoney5787 Member Full Member

    296
    0
    Oct 7, 2009
    Kirkland could be out and fighting in about 10 months with good behavior.

    Boxing this year was definitely defined by the losses that occured outside the ring.
     
  6. juanitoboxing

    juanitoboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,010
    1
    Jul 28, 2008
    We still have the super six left and Pac-Cotto, kinda early to put a name for the year
     
  7. JohnAkiBoa

    JohnAkiBoa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,582
    0
    Mar 27, 2009
    Shumenov did not get Exposed dumb ass *******..:patsch

    Pretty boy Exposed Pac when he Schooled JMM...
     
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006

    Shumenov was expected to roll over and beat campillo easily, there was already talks about him unifying with Erdei before the bout.

    He loses and cries the other guy cheated for dissappearing for a 1 minute or 2 to not take a drug test.

    Shumenov has been exposed.
     
  9. DeanoFlash

    DeanoFlash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,021
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    shaky, but full of potential.
     
  10. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    Dude you didn't even see the fight.

    It's foolish to cry ''eposed'' after every loss.They're rematching anyway.
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,098
    2,731
    Jul 20, 2004
    It's great, we got a lot of awesome PPV events and many possible great ones to come in 2010. Boxing is on fire.
     
  12. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    yes

    what is your definition of exposed?

    There is a common misconception here that exposed means hes a lousy fighter. That is no where near what I meant. Shumenov was hyped (Me being apart of the wagon) as the current best prospect and ready to take on the elites in the division. Hes been exposed that he is a sore loser and will not able to hang with the likes of Dawson, and Hopkins.

    Im rooting for him, I really am.
     
  13. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    I know you didn't see it because nobody has.A copy of it is HARD to find.

    So because he can't hang with Dawson(Hopkins is basically gone) he's exposed?Disagree.
    Exposed is when a guy undefeated or not on the way up beats a few mediocre guys without showing any weaknesses and losses to a mediocre guy he was expected t obeat.
    IMO Shumenov has shown his weaknesses earlier and while I was surprised can't say I was shicked.
    Not a sore loser either.
     
  14. G.A.V.

    G.A.V. Guest

    Feels like **** all has happened really since the first 4 month.
     
  15. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,281
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    the fight wasnt even televised

    correctomundo

    every fighter shows weaknesses there is no such thing as a perfect prospect, its just a question if they can tweek their flaws. Shumenov was expected to roll over this guy, and ended up with a loss.

    When you accuse the other fighter of cheating AFTER losing with no hard proof...it is being a sore loser.