Who do you think won that fight, Froch or Dirrell?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Healy, Oct 17, 2009.

  1. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,960
    Likes Received:
    109
    I had Dirrell winning the first three and last two. Middle rounds clearly to Froch. Point deduction sealed the deal.

    Although Froch looked awful for much of the time and is a KO waiting to happen.
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,098
    Kessler will KO either one of them. Dirrel needs to learn that you can't win a fight by not fighting.
     
  3. DDA365

    DDA365 Gatecrasher Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    1
    Where can I find highlights of this?
     
  4. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Messages:
    15,294
    Likes Received:
    6
    I thought Dirrell won by a two or three rounds; he really made Froch look pedestrian at times.

    It wasn't the worst decision I've seen though.
     
  5. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,920
    Likes Received:
    372
    Direll by a round for me. I don't fancy Froch's chances against either Abraham or Kessler. Direll was quite impressive and can only improve.
     
  6. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,219
    Likes Received:
    3
    I had Dirrell up by 2 rounds but with the point deduction obviously only one.

    I enjoyed the fight and it was a close one so i cant see how anyone could call robbery etc.

    Froch needs to up his game if he is to even compete with Kessler.
     
  7. Misery Guts

    Misery Guts New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2009
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dirrell seems to think that boxing is a non-contact sport he is a whiny little cry baby and got the L he deserved, ironically when he dared to open up in the last few rounds he was beating Froch from pillar to post.
     
  8. tomhighway

    tomhighway Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Felt Dirrell sneaked it in the last few rounds.
     
  9. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    1
    I had trouble scoring much for Froch or Dirrell - I'd have liked to have given them both a loss. Dirrell just had no intention of engaging. He has great handspeed, better footwork than he's shown in the past and can obviously punch more than I'd thought, but he was awful.

    He just ran round the ring, throwing pitter-pat jabs that weren't doing very much. He wasn't boxing Froch, he was trying to keep him from engaging. If he'd stepped round then thrown a 1-2 while Froch passed, he'd be setting traps but... well, he wasn't.

    Froch was woeful. He had Dirrell against the ropes and he kept head-hunting. The guy had the speed to move everytime but he can't do that with his body. Shorten up your hooks and sting him there.

    In the same way that Hopkins' negativity eventually overrode the good work he did against Calzaghe, Dirrell's negativity (and the deserved point deduction) meant it was incredibly close.

    I had it 7-5 for Dirrell but, with the point deduction, a draw is entirely feasible. Neither guy deserves the title.
     
  10. leighton

    leighton Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dirrell won it for me. Look at the amount of shots Froch had that missed the target. Dirrell had a negative gameplan but it worked for him and he was landing some clean punches. Home town decision. I dont think Froch will have a hope against King Arthur or Kessler. Go in and fight like that against those guys and it is a different story.
     
  11. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    I've just seen this fight and can only say that you do not, and should not, win world titles by running like a *****. Both fighters were pretty ineffective but only one of them was trying to engage, and that is what won Froch the fight.

    For all those who are shouting judge corruption just imagine the fight was in the US and both fighters were American, on that performance last night only one of them would have a chance of getting the decision and it wouldn't have been Dirrell.
     
  12. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,158
    Likes Received:
    2
    These fights will be completely different as neither of them will be on their bikes...chalk and cheese opponents
     
  13. phonk

    phonk Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Forch won it.

    Dirrell far too negative. Running and constant clinching.
     
  14. phonk

    phonk Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two of the judges awarded Froch the last two rounds.
     
  15. safc1990

    safc1990 Goodbye Bolo :( Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    One of the few times I can understand their anger. I had the same score as Healy, 116-111 Dirrell.