The reality of Dirrell vs Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Quick'N'Slick

    Quick'N'Slick Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Dec 12, 2008
    Only english fans think froch won, Dirrell won the match easy
     
    Quick'N'Slick, Oct 18, 2009
    Quick'N'Slick, Oct 18, 2009
    #16
  2. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Proveably wrong.
     
    Cobbler, Oct 18, 2009
    Cobbler, Oct 18, 2009
    #17
  3. Donnyb

    Donnyb Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    37
    Apr 25, 2009
    It was a terrible fight and neither deserved it, but why become a fighter if you dont want to fight. It would be bad for boxing if you win titles by running away and diving on the floor when someone tries to hit you.

    Does Dirrell have talent? yes, maybe he should have used it more and he probably would have won the fight outright and no one could dispute it.
     
    Donnyb, Oct 18, 2009
    Donnyb, Oct 18, 2009
    #18
  4. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    I wouldn't say that. I check the english lounge yesterday and majority of the brits thought Dirrell got robbed. I think is just Froch supports that refuse to admit that he got a gift.
     
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    #19
  5. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007
    He's worse than Junior Witter and John Ruiz combined.

    The irony is that he has the skills to be a brilliant fighter but lacks the heart.

    He lost the fight by running. And I mean literally RUNNING.
     
    David UK, Oct 18, 2009
    David UK, Oct 18, 2009
    #20
  6. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007
    INCORRECT. There was a majority who thought Dirrell won. That's not the same as most thinking it was a robbery. Big difference
     
    David UK, Oct 18, 2009
    David UK, Oct 18, 2009
    #21
  7. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Dirrell did everything right as i explained from my opening post. Dirrell was going for the knock out. A ko was the only way he could have won last night. 115-112 by two judges.. r they kidding? Froch did nothing but getting tag. Dirrell could knock Froch down and still lost.
     
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    #22
  8. dandur55

    dandur55 Active Member Full Member

    1,020
    8
    Apr 8, 2006
    I defenetly thought dirrell won the fight,

    but the solid evidence of that he won the fight is the Sky Bet, Bet365 and most of bookies who have they own experts, on Live betting going in to round 12 Froch was 10/2 to win the fight while Dirrell was 1/5 to win it.

    So i would defenetly say Dirrell won the fight
     
    dandur55, Oct 18, 2009
    dandur55, Oct 18, 2009
    #23
  9. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    good point.
     
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    tliang1000, Oct 18, 2009
    #24
  10. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    What we're you watching Dirrell going for the knock out are you serious. I had Dirrell winning 114-113 but can understand why he didn't get the decision, his negativety lost him that fight all he had to was be a tiny bit more positive in his approach and he would have won as clearly as you seem to think he did but the reality is he didn't and due to that this fight had a disputed decision at the end.
     
    royalt0208, Oct 18, 2009
    royalt0208, Oct 18, 2009
    #25
  11. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Froch was reduced to fight dirty just to keep himself in the fight, the young prospect beat him.
     
    pngo, Oct 18, 2009
    pngo, Oct 18, 2009
    #26
Page 2 of 2