Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

The answers are there as to why Dirrell won.. asking yet again why he won is presenting the same argument which has already been answered a million times by people on here..

 

Youve gotta be insane. berto-collazo, clottey-cotto, diaz-malignaggi, hopkins-calzaghie.....direll-froch was way closer then any of those fights.

 

Sorry but no

Effective Aggression, Clena Punches, Ring Generalship.
Those are the 3 things judges are to scorte apon.
The first 2 parts are split 50/50 with the fighters.
Effective Aggression - Froch was the aggressor and had to chase Dirrel. Leaving himself open to counterpunching to land his left hooks and other shots. 50/50
Clean Punches - A true arguable one. But since it is easier to hit someone who is over ecxtended because you are running. And Froch had his moments. 50/50
And the last. Well if it werent fro Froch this fight
would have been the biggest POS fight since ...? Froch made the fight.

IF Dirrel hadnt been scared and wasnt running
ike he did he WOULD have won this fight. hell he might have even STOPPED Froch by attrtition. BUT unfortunately for us fans he ran no less than 7 rounds.

FYI I had it 113/111 for Froch.
A SD ... 1 out of the 3. Look up my scorecard with round comments...

 

Commentators were so very biased.

So..........Dirrell fans believe that boxing is falling down on canvas, holding, running, and complaining. OK, nexy time a Euro does that, they should award him the fight. Always remember, in a boxing match, do not fight, just run, hold, complain and fall down on canvas.

 

the cleaner punches were not split..

 

lewis-holyfield 2 was more corrupt of a decision then lewis-holyfield 1

Britain has better healthcare??? hahaha, If AMERICA goes to socialized medicin we are ****ED!!!!

 

and if all else fails.. punch the air..

 

locking

 

Blood all over Dirrell's face. I guess he punched himself? Froch made the fight, if not for him there would have been no fight.

 

vote and explain

 

Simple. A SD!
Effective Aggression, Clean Punches, Ring Generalship.
The first 2 are a 50/50 split but Froch dominated the third. My final outcome was 113/111 Froch. A SD!

 

they'll blame the fact that Dirrell ran, moaned all fight.. and conveniently ignore the fact that he still landed clearer punches and more of them.. on top of that having Froch rocked in the later rounds..

 

Froch was more aggressive & he made Dirrell run and hold all night. So he controlled the fight.

 

Both fighters were exposed.
Neither will win this tourney.

But good post.

 

How were Froch's punches as clean as Dirrells?