Just Watched the Direll/Froch fight Again...Two things are Blatently Obvious.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, Oct 18, 2009.


  1. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    No need to judge with "emotions" when Dirrell was the only one landing. Plz explain how Froch won beside obvious hometown decision?
     
  2. EL CABALLO

    EL CABALLO Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,497
    1
    Feb 28, 2009
    Darryl is a proven racist, if it's black, he'll root 4 'em, no matter what, and he'll see them winning no matter what! No objectivity in his long, "educated words" posts!! He's a proven hater!!... BTW, Hi Darryl!
     
  3. No10Point

    No10Point Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,204
    0
    Mar 8, 2009
    113/111 - Froch.
    Was my score card.
    Effective Agression, Clean Punches, Ring General Ship.
    Froch split the first 2 with Dirrel but dominated the the third. So you get a SD.

    And why does ever American boxer
    who runs around not fighting call themselves warriors?

    Dirrel shouldn't have ran.
    he did better when he didnt. I think he could have wore Froch down if he hadn't ran.
    But alas I had him running no less than 7 rounds ... To bad.

    Good news is I hope this makes Ward
    stand his ground more against Kessler. That should make it all that much better for us to watch.
     
  4. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    WOW...You Said CLEAN PUNCHES.

    What fight were you watching. If you thought Froch landed for CLEAN PUNCHES than Direll...you need a New TV. That old Black and White TV have you confused...Froch was the WHITE GUY!!!
     
  5. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    Actually I had Direll 115-114 (After the BS point deduction).
     
  6. K2ray

    K2ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,040
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    :goodWell said. I'm done.