So you are making an assumption about peoples voting intentions? Why bother with polls?, lets just listen to Dr. Valdez :deal
Super six tournament fights should not be allowed to have their fights in the fighters hometown and should be at a neutral site. Dirrell got screwed plain and simple.
Dirrel just lacked the bottle to get in a fight and win which is a shame for someone with such talent.
It is impossible to give the 1st round to either fighter when neither did anything at all. If ever there was a CLEAR 10-10 round, that was it. It was a close fight, wherein I thought Direll edged it, but I also agree that you shouldn't win a fight by running and holding instead of fighting. Therefore I don't mind Froch getting the decision. Though I think a draw would probably have been the right result. I'm not watching it again in a hurry to make a more accurate analysis...
I don't need assumptions.. I've witnessed the majority pointing out Froch won are Brits.. Despite a good amount of them handing it to Dirrell..
anyone who thinks that the judges purposefully gave Froch the decision because the fight was in Nottingham and the judges were payed off or given some other sort of incentive to score it for Froch, is imo being an idiot.
Christ. Its got the point where the same people are just re-posting the same stuff. ****ing pointless.
I think this is important to remember, by far the worst style for Froch in the draw, also when you look at it now Froch has the hardest draw of all of them.
if you scored round 6 for Dirrell then I am revoking your judging rights permenantly. That round was even more in favour of Froch than the 3rd.
Stop making the same threads over and over again. A handful of posters responsible for this and I am taking note.