Fight stats for Dirrell/Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008

    Thats 3 more clean punches than Dirrell landed.
     
  2. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    :good
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yes, providing the punch lands. :lol:
     
  4. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    :good:yep:lol:
     
  5. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    :lol:

    your a joke.. a nuthuggin' joke.. :lol:
     
  6. Exposed

    Exposed *** East Side VIP **** Full Member

    2,312
    1
    Jan 20, 2007
    I can't believe Showtime didn't have punchstats for this fight. And to top it off, Taylor-Abraham was on tape delay instead of a live broadcast. Is this how they treat a major fight in their own tournament? This just shows why HBO is head and shoulders above Showtime.
     
  7. 3_days

    3_days New Member Full Member

    66
    0
    Aug 22, 2009

    A quick effort,
    but by request ...


    :D


    This content is protected
     
  8. lONGCOUNTED

    lONGCOUNTED I Killed MMA Full Member

    2,003
    0
    Sep 5, 2008
    I guess you ignored the poster that embedded the video of Froch backing into the ropes and getting saved by the bell. How ****ing convenient for you.
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Froch was not hurt. I watched it on my 60" screen, HD on DVR replay several times. Dirrell has not power to hurt Froch. Such a joke Dirrell is, runs like Hell, falls down on canvas, holds, complains. Such a sick joke.
     
  10. Exposed

    Exposed *** East Side VIP **** Full Member

    2,312
    1
    Jan 20, 2007
    Zab Judah wasn't hurt against Kostya Tsyzu either. He was just off balanced like Froch.
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Shut the **** up you bench ****ing ***git!

    This content is protected


    What do you call that? It sure as hell looked he hurt Froch...I dare ya bitchass to try to dispute facts...I dare ya!
     
  12. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    This content is protected


    You mean to tell that Froch was not hurt??? You stans are to ****ing much!:lol::rofl
     
  13. make_the_weight

    make_the_weight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,433
    26
    Mar 21, 2009
    You could have watched it on a plasma the size of the moon but if your blinded by bias you would still not see Froch backtracking because he was hurt
     
  14. soapysouter

    soapysouter Active Member Full Member

    568
    0
    Apr 20, 2009
    Done my own fight stats having sat watching each round on replay, just the basics mind

    Froch threw 373
    Froch landed 67(38 jabs)
    % landed 18%

    Dirrell threw 309
    Dirrell landed 86(35jabs)
    % landed 28%





    After rewatching the entire fight, my scorecard

    Rnd 1 10-10 (23T 3L - 22T 5L)

    Rnd 2 10-9 Froch. Despite a couple of nice hooks by Dirrell, Frochs workrate wins him the round. (F 29T-5L - D 17T-5L)

    Rnd 3 10-9 Dirrell. Froch lands nice right hand, Dirrel lands nice counter and outlands during the right several straights to the body score. (F 21T-2L - D 20T-7L)

    Rnd 4 10-9 Dirrell. Froch throws alot of wild punches and misses, Nice RH to the body. Dirrel lands the best punches of the round, straight right counter. ( F 30T-4L - D 25T-6L)

    Rnd 5 10-9 Dirrell. Froch throws alot of jabs, but only connects with 4. Dirrell lands severall to the body and a big right hand. ( F 31T-4L - D 26T-7L)

    Rnd6 10-9 Froch. Froch finally gets in close and lands a couple of hooks and straights in the round. Dirrell lands little. ( F 31T-6L - D 21T-3L)

    Rnd7 10-9 Froch. Close round.Hardest one to count which punches connect. Froch manages to get away with throwing punches whilst holding. Lands several hooks.Dirrell lands a big left some straights and jabs. ( F 31T-10L - D 29T-8L)

    Rnd 8 10-10. Froch lands a big left whilst Dirrell lands a big right and a nice hook. Close round. ( F 28T-5L - D 22T-6L)

    Rnd 9 10-9.Dirrell. Both guys stepped it up, Froch threw alot and connected with 6 jabs. Dirrell landed his jab aswell as a couple of straights and hooks to win the round. ( F 40T-7L - D 30T-10L)

    Rnd 10. 9-9. Froch lands one eye catching jab.He likes to push down on opponents head with one hand whilst trying to throw uppercut.Dirrell lands some really nice lefts and wins the round. deducted 1 point for holding. ( F 32T-5L - D 33T-8L)

    Rnd 11. 10-9 Dirrell. Action round.Both fighter throw there most amount of punches in the fight. Froch landsa couple to the body, an upper cut and hook. But Dirrell lands some big shots, and stuns Froch towards the end of the round. ( F 41T-8L - D 36T-12L)

    Rnd 12. 10-9 Dirrell. Froch again lands his jab and several body shots and won the second part of the round. Dirrell landed early on and won ist half. Close round. ( F 36T-8L - D 28T-9L)

    My scorecard. 116-113 Dirrell.

    Two drawn rounds the first round I can't see any reason to give to either, has to be a draw. Rnd 8 Is close, Froch throws a few more, Dirrell lands one extra and the cleaner punches. Round 12 is up for debate also. so if you score the 8th to Froch and the 12 to Froch then It would be a draw.

    Froch threw alot of Jabs as he came forward that never seemed to have a chance of getting there, almost seemed like they were for the judges. If your coming forward and throwing jabs that are falling half a yard short you can't score him the round on aggression, he needs to be more effective, single punch, missing by alot aggression doesnt count. Dirrell never wasted a punch, he fought in bursts but was efficient.

    Having watched it again there is no way you can call it a robbery. Alot of close rounds which could be difficuilt to score on the night, add in Frochs aggression(so they say), Dirrells holding(which didnt seem as bad the second time round, and not as bad as Frochs antics at times), the home crowd cheering everything even though most of what was being cheered was wild punches being missed, then its clear that all the close rounds went Frochs way instead of being called draws or the couple that I gave to Dirrell(12th for example)

    ps trying to work out what connected and what didnt was difficuilt. Im not even sure they stats would even sound correct, but I gave it a shot never the less.:lol:
     
  15. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    2
    Oct 26, 2008
    Dirrell landed about 25 clean and snappy punches through out the fight. Plus about 20 lower quality punches.

    Froch landed about 3 clean snappy punches through out the fight. Plus about 80 lower quality punches.