How did this fight affect your opinion of Taylor?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrStayman, Sep 30, 2007.


  1. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    If he were so superior with handspeed and technique those punch stats wouldn't have been so close.

    The idea that he was better technically spawned completely out of that relationship with Kronk gym. There was no real truth to that. And he has never put on a performance to give that indication anyhow.
     
  2. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Exactly, yes.
     
  3. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    :nono
    Pavlik was definately the better boxer, outjabbed him, and set up that montrous right hand that had Taylor out on his feet.
     
  4. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    It didn't. It just reaffirmed the opinion I already held and that is that Taylor's an idiot!
     
  5. MrStayman

    MrStayman Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    The problem I have with this is that I think that "average" is too harsh a term, designed to troll and annoy American fans. Tonight, neither Taylor nor Pavlik were average fighters.

    The Euro argument would be more believable and less childish if they would just call these fighters "great, but not elite" instead. No matter how you cut it, an average fighter does not unify the middleweight belts. Also, an average fighter does not win the middleweight title against the undisputed champion while improving his KO rate to 90.6%.
     
  6. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    I think Taylor needs to get some more experience in the gym with high intensity sparring for a lot of rounds. It was funny how Manny was telling him you have him fighting at a pace hes not used to, but reallly it was the opposite. Taylor wasnt prepared to fight the type of fight he needed to wear out Pavlik. To me Pavlik is a larger version of Diego Corrales. Easy to hit, but super tough. Taylor is maybe not as good as I thought, because he wasnt able to sustain any type of pace, and thats part of being a great fighter.
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,252
    Jun 30, 2005
    Before this fight, I believed Taylor would beat Pavlik.

    Now, I have changed my opinion.
     
  8. Chinchecker71

    Chinchecker71 New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Jul 27, 2004
    Taylor is a great boxer who's still young and learning. I think he learned yesterday that boxing is a "offensive" as well as "defensive" sport. When you get knocked out because of an accumulation of blows it means your defense is leaky.

    Look at Jermain's body versus Pavlik's. Pavlik is wiry and in the fights I've seen he doesn't tire to a point where he's really sloppy. Jermain is thicker and tends to empty his tank and require time to gas up.

    I think he should take a fight in between the rematch. He needs to fight someone else.
     
  9. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    32,044
    3,343
    Apr 16, 2005
    My opinion was confirmed - Taylor is an overrated HBO hype job with a questionable chin, who got decisions he didn't deserve and kept the title too long because of the power of HBO.

    The HBO suits were trying to set up another gift for Taylor, but Pavlik spoiled their plans. Sorry HBO, but ya can't get a gift decision while yer lying on the canvas!! :lol:
     
  10. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Very athletic fighter with sound skills, but nothing great. I'd say he's as good now as he's ever going to get. To his credit, he showed real toughness and heart.
     
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    He might burn in the sun faster, but he would do so with the WBC and WBO middleweight titles.
     
  12. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,252
    Jun 30, 2005
    Actually, the fight contradicted several of your opinions. Taylor nearly beat the guy who is now #1 in the middleweight division. He almost had him out in the second round, and continued to fight well until the end. He was nailed repeatedly without getting flattened until the final knockdown, against a guy with huge punching power.
     
  13. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,920
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    :good It was a hell of a fight.
     
  14. Mrvooh

    Mrvooh Guest

    One loss, I guess, changes a champ to overrated? I guess Ali was overrated when Frazier beat him...then Frazier was overrated when Foreman beat him...Liston was overrated when Clay beat him...Foreman was overrated when Ali beat him Louis was overrated when Max beat him, but Max was overrated when Louis got vengence. Patterson was overrated when Ingemar beat him, but Ingemar was overrated when patterson beat him, then Patterson was RE-RE overrated when Liston beat him, who was RE-RE overrated when Clay beat him again..
    TONS of overrated champs out there!! ,and it takes only one loss.:rofl
     
  15. sandwichsurgeon

    sandwichsurgeon Active Member Full Member

    1,031
    4
    Feb 23, 2007
    The fight confirmed my suspicions that Hopkins, Taylor and Wright are not as good as they are believed to be, Hopkins has been fighting rarely and sticking to fighting a seniors tour and taylor, Winky seems to be slipping and Taylor looked bad against Spinks and Ouma.

    With Winky, Taylor and Hopkins all being on par with each other and Taylor fighting very close fights with B level opposition it sent alarm bells ringing that the ATG's Wink and Hop aren't what they used to be which is why they are on the level of the Hype job Taylor.

    I gave them all the benefit of the doubt and resigned myself to make my judgement of their calibre based upon Taylor vs Pavlik, Taylor lost fair and square but Pavlik is obviously limited, keeping Winky, Hop and Taylor in the p4p top 10 while bringing Pavlik in would require me to make more excuses to defend these guys and i'm not buying it anymore.

    If Pavlik, Hopkins, Winky and Taylor fight some guys that aren't named Pavlik, Hopkins, Winky and Taylor and put on some stellar performances against good opposition I will change my mind and put them back in my top 10 but i'm not sold on them anymore.