I had it 4 rounds to 2 in favor of Taylor. Ps. Best avatar I've seen in a while: This content is protected
How could you score the first round for Pavlik? Rest of it I had the same as you, although I thought rounds 4 - 6 could have leigitmately gone either way. 1 + 2 were clearly Taylor and 3 was clearly Pavlik though, IMHO. Rafael's not much at scoring. He's very useful with rumors and is good at factual reporting, but doesn't have a great eye for a lot of what goes on in the ring.
Well, I have it for Taylor too. Here's my score card: 1 Pavlik 10-9 2 Taylor 10-8 3 Pavlik 10-9 4 Taylor 10-9 5 Taylor 10-9 6 Pavlik 10-9
What does that tell u about the majority of the posters on this site then? I had Pavlik up 4-2 after 6. He was raking Taylor with those right hands all night. Taylor was offering up little flurries here and there but Pavlik was doing the more steady work.
1. Pavlik 10-9 2. Taylor 10-8 3. Pavlik 10-9 4. EVEN 10-10 5. Taylor 10-9 6. Pavlik 10-9 57-57 DEAD EVEN going into the 7th on my card. I have watched the fight 3 times now and could easily see it being 57-56 someone going into the 7th. Anyone that had Taylor ahead by 3+ points needs to have their head examined. The judge that had Taylor up 5 oints should be banned from boxing. :-(
If you think Taylor was ahead by 4, 5,or 6 points, its a fair question to ask "WTF were you watching?":good 6-0?? :yikes :nono :-( :hi:
Bert is completely irrelevant these days. he seems like the alzheimers-ridden uncle that people tolerate because he used to be well-respected. i actually spasm in discomfort when he dissects a fight.
:good He's a contact guy. By no means a good analyst. If he were they'd have planted his ass on ESPN anyways. As if that would ever happen. I think Atlas would **** himself.
Taylor was clearly winning, but definitely not every round. I had Taylor up 3 points and most other unbiased people did as well.