Who fought better against Valuev, Holyfield or Haye?

Im actually very embarresed to admit this but... I actually want to see Ruiz fight Haye now to see what the hell is going to happen. I guess its kinda like wanting to smell how bad your own fart smells when your all alone.

 

holyfield. imagine what if evander fought valuev when he was 25.

 

wlad is the wba champ.

 

Holyfield certainly won more rounds. He actually ENGAGED Valuev. Haye ran.

 

ruslan beat valuev for the title.

 

Two wrongs don't make a right. Even if it can be argued that Holyfield did better against Valuev, that doesn't mean Haye deserved to lose.

 

exactly. ruslan never lost it.

 

True True. Just going to be very interesting how they choreograph the script of keeping Haye a "champion" when he had such a poor showing against a not very good opponent and very questionable "champion". Should make for an interesing WWE type storyline in the division.

 

Ruiz lost to Valuev, actually Holy did too (although he was robbed) so I guess we agree that Haye should have lost this fight...

 

Yeah guys, let's not run and fight toe to toe with a 300 pound man.

 

He's well past his best, but he's a living legend nonetheless;
Dont ever apply the word chump to Evander Holyfield.:nono

 

When I say chump in refernce to Holy, its only pertaining to the old Holy that cant let go. Of course I recognize hes a HOFer but, hes got to let go of the dream hes going to become UNDISPUTED heavyweight champ again and take care of his health. After this debacle with Haye, he may very well become champ again of a belt, but its vs lesser opponents and not the best. He doesnt need to be fighting among this company and putting himself at risk for further health issues (brain damage). So thats where I was coming from with the chump comment. I recognize his former greatness, but what hes doing now is just silly.