Has Margarito EVER made serious attempts to call out guys at least CLOSE to his size?

:roll:atsch Palease more excuses
Fact is Hatton saw what kind of speed demon monster Floyd was at 140, and thought he had a better chance at beating him at 147. thinking that floyd's speed would be less a factor at 147 and his brute strength would be the equalizer. I guess Hatton was wrong.. LOL

Floyd does not have the liner belt because Hatton refused to fight him at 140.. Imagine the Liner champ not ready for a challenge .. ..

Jezz you have over nine thousand post, and you haven't clue what your talking aboutatsch

which mean you have done nothing but spam this board with BS !! what a shame ..

 

Are you ****in serious? DO you actually believe this obvious bull****? Hatton thought Floyd would be slower at 147, so wanted him there....WTF?!?! atsch

Well, all he had to do was make himself the #1 contender, like he did with Gatti right?

 

Spin spin spin spin spin and a whole lot of speculation. At the end of the day, the Hatton vs PBF fight was held at 147 - FACT :deal

You've been proven wrong since you emphatically stated that Marquez was the only smaller fighter Floyd has fought.

Hatton did not belong at 147 yet Floyd made him come up from 140 to fight him - FACT :deal

No matter how much you try to spin spin spin spin spin it, Floyd cut off his nose to spite his face in doing that, because today he doesn't have the 140 linear championship to his name - FACT :deal

FYI - it's 'linear' or 'lineal' not 'liner' you dumb mala****aaaaaaa

Learn to spell - your posts make you look as dumb as that dawg in your avatar :yep

 

OK let see you twist this one .. Are you going to set behind your keyboard and deny Hatton turned down floyd at 140 ... Please let me see you say something different ///

 

It's funny watching these sackswingers spin in ever-decreasing circles...they just make themselves look dumber at every turn :yep

Dumb pit's gone from claiming Marquez was the only smaller fighter Floyd has faced to wildly speculating as to why the Hatton fight was at 147.

All this scrambling only draws more attention to the fact that he prefers to twist and turn and change the subject in order to avoid facing reality :yep

 

Move along dumb ass .. Iv already shown you that Hatton wanted no part of floyd at 140 and at 147 there was no difference in size between the two.

At 140 or 147 Floyd beats Hatton no matter what .. so please just stop your argument is irrelevant .. Marquez is the only small man on Floyd resume...

 

No you din't you just repeated the same spin spin spin spin spin and speculation over and over again

You lose

you dumb mother****ing dawg :yep

"LINEAR/LINEAL" not "LINER"

 

See the attempt to deflect in this post.

In a thread where dumb dawg pit **** has claimed Marquez was the only smaller man Floyd has fought, he's now trying to make it about whether or not Hatton turned PBF down.

I ask the obvious - what does dumbdawg****'s speculation of whether or not Hatton turned Floyd down have to do with the fact that Hatton was the smaller man when they fought?

 

Well if you would like make a poll, gather public opinion .. Floyd is listed at 5'8 with a reach of 72 inches and started his career at 130. Hatton is 5'7 with a reach of 65 inches and started his career at 140.. on the night of the fight Floyd weighed 147 Hatton weighed 145 so were is the big difference you dumb ****... Public opinion was that Hatton would be to strong for floyd on the inside, does that sound like Hatton was the smaller dude.


Like I said, you have nine thousand post on the site and you have not learned a dame thing. You my friend are straight up garbage..



Your not even a fan of the sport you just some dumb **** that like spending his time spamming the board.

Again Marqueze is the only small man on floyd's resume.

 

You can't deflect from facts you deluded dumb ****.. Floyd and Hatton are the same size there is not noticeable size difference between the two, only a dumb **** like you would say there is. How in the **** is 1 inch a big size advantage .. No disrespect but you're ****ing stupid. :good

 

And how did he fare against them ?

You know I'm not a Margarita hater....I just can't stand the cheating ******* !!!

 

Jesus Christ, how is it some people are just so dumb they can deny a certain logic on one point but then try to use it to prove a point of their own?

****ing hell, the nuthugger runs deep in this one :yep

I'm just surprised you're not trying to use the same 'logic' to prove that JMM is in fact the same size as PBF, I mean, you quoted Hatton's stats against PBFs, but not JMMs...let's take a look shall we:

PBF:

• height 5'8
• reach 72"
• weight vs Hatton 147lbs
• weight vs JMM 146lbs

Hatton:

• height 5'7
• reach 65"
• weight vs PBF 145lbs

JMM:

• height 5'7
• reach 67"
• weight vs PBF 142lbs.

JMM is the same height as Hatton and has a greater reach - why not say JMM was the same size as PBF too...or maybe just say that both Hatton and JMM were smaller men than PBF?

You're a dumb mother****er dawg :yep

Keep arguing though, I love your twisted logic

 

Oh, so now we're using adjectives like 'noticeable' to back up our claims - gee, no subjectivity there

Getting a bit heated are we, dummy? :yep

Facts can be your friends if you let them you know...don't fight them and get all frustrated when they show you up for the idiot you are :yep

You yourself posted stats that back up my claim of Hatton being the smaller man vs PBF - regardless of how small the difference is, it's still a fact that Hatton is one inch shorter than PBF, has 7" less in reach than PBF, and weighed 2 lbs less than PBF when they fought.

Can you still spin those FACTS to indicate that Hatton was the same size as PBF?

 

Unless you live on the other side of a black hole, these stats show that PBF is bigger than Hatton.

Can you dig iiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttaaaaaaa?!?!?!?

:rofl

 

I think pit-bit-dumb-dawg-**** finally realised he can't argue with facts, especially ones he posted himself