If 1+lb is no big deal for Cotto, then why did Floyd...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BizarroRJJ, Nov 11, 2009.


  1. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    How?
     
  2. pit

    pit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,159
    6
    Jul 25, 2004

    just like making your opponent boil down to a unhealthy weight is a advantage
     
  3. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    No they aren't lol... And what are the agenda's fool if there are any lol...!!!???:nut Cotto has not looked like this since his last days at 140:-(.
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Pit, I said this months ago, and I truly hope Cotto's health is not at stake making weight. Roach is a weasel.
     
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Roach got 145 put in the contract, and now PAc's fans and Roach say it doesn't matter. Ok if that's the case, cancel/edit the contract like Floyd did, and tell Cotto he can come in at 147 then lol... Too late huh lol...
     
  6. brood3

    brood3 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,050
    0
    Feb 5, 2009
    Lets see the Laws of Physics dictates. That the heavier an object the more force it will have.

    So when Mayweather was heavier that night. He had more power in his punches.
     
  7. BizarroRJJ

    BizarroRJJ Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Sep 1, 2009
    True, but when both agree to it---THERE ARE NO EXCUSES! Of course every fighter wants sometype of advantage. Its all about if the advantages taken or conceeded are agreeable by both sides. In each case, I havent heard of Pacmans team holding a gun to the oppositions head making them take the fight at a specific weight. Same with Floyd, he played within the contract. He was penalized as per the contract, but he still abided by it penalities and all. That was JMM fault. Cottos downfall will be that he may underestimate the weight loss effects and he will not be willing to be penalized for coming in heavier.
     
  8. brood3

    brood3 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,050
    0
    Feb 5, 2009
    You mean evening the playing field.

    Unhealthy? Cotto weighed 146 in his fight with Clottey. He still look good in that fight and he won. So your unhealthy statement has no merit.
     
  9. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You don't really have an answer. No disrespect to you, but I don't care what answer you give because you're wrong!
     
  10. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Clottey-Cotto was not a catch weight fight so when guys say Cotto weighed 146 for his last fight, you sound like fools...
     
  11. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    133
    Nov 22, 2008
    What?:lol:

    Go to school, study some physics, some bio-mechanics, and come back after!

    :hi:
     
  12. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I agree with some of what you're saying, but fighters don't really care about advantages to be honest.
     
  13. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    This is my sole account here you clown. It's been proven time and time again that you're a phony. You claim the be a Former World Champion? Prove it or simply shut the **** up :good
     
  14. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    How so? The fact of the matter is, Cotto weighed in at 146, did he not?