Was DLH really all that shot against Manny?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tszyu, Nov 15, 2009.


  1. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Don't be distracted by Pacquiao's performance, just focus on Oscar. Look at a PRIME De La Hoya and then look at the version that fought Pacquiao. Completely different. You're assumption that Pacquiao would beat a prime 147 Hoya (even more easily) is frankly laughable.
     
  2. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Worst that ODLH ever looked. It was pathetic.

    Manny whipped his butt, no doubt, but ODLH looked like a WW version of Skeletor or something. His nutrition and hydration were all messed up.
     
  3. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006


    You're also kind of implying that Cotto is better than a prime DLH at 147. Which is also laughable
     
  4. Tszyu

    Tszyu Active Member Full Member

    1,249
    0
    Aug 10, 2009
    I think your avatar is laughable. And I did not say that idiot.
     
  5. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I always gave PAC credit for DLH. Sure it wasn't the very best DLH but the same DLH that gave Floyd 12 hard rounds before.
     
  6. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Which is the same reason PAC beat Cotto. Shot, weight draned ect.:rofl
     
  7. teemy

    teemy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,404
    79
    May 5, 2007
    pac is great and is going to destroy PBF in an embarassment but DLH did everything wrong for that fight - he was eating low carb for example and probably was low on stamina/energy as a result in addition to being dehydrated
     
  8. ksuppercut

    ksuppercut New Member Full Member

    44
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    It was DLH's fault for moving down to that weight and only has himself to blame...
     
  9. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009
    Seeing all the shots he took from Forbes in the tune-up fight before Pac, and Oscar's face getting uncharacteristically busted up, then not even really fighting or having anything behind his punches vs. Forbes and especially Pac, I'd say he was shot.

    I won't say a prime Oscar beats pac, that's tough to say at this point, but he would have made a much better showing. Oscar was 10 YEARS past his prime. Think about it.
     
  10. raiderjay

    raiderjay Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 7, 2007
    I think that the Forbes fight showed that DLH was partially shot. Not completely, but partialy. Pac vs. a version of DLH from 1998 or so is a fantastic fight. The DLH that Pac fought was a decent fighter that can't hang with the top five in any division from 140-160.

    Freddie Roach called it in the pre fight interview when he said DLH just couldn't pull the trigger anymore. That was completely correct, he couldn't pull the trigger against a top flight fighter anymore.
     
  11. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009
    No, it wasn't even the Oscar that fought Floyd a year earlier. That Oscar wouldn't have got his face busted up against little Forbes.