Evander Holyfield is one of the most underated fighters of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sugarsean, Nov 2, 2009.


  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    He was not robbed against Valuev. That was a close fight in which the hometown fighter and champ got the benefit of the doubt. That's no robbery. :-(

    Having said that. I don't think he is underated. I have him between 8 and 11 at hw, alongside Frazier, Foreman and Liston, and he would certainly be at number one at cw. Pretty fair imo.
     
  2. MrMarvel

    MrMarvel Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,792
    15
    Jan 29, 2009
    He has a terrific resume, some great wins, was a tough competitor, and would be successful in most heavyweight divisions of the past. I think he is a great heavyweight. He's top 10 for me. I think the initial post that started this thread is on the money. Put that way you can't help but be impressed.
     
  3. mike_bngs

    mike_bngs Active Member Full Member

    943
    2
    Nov 8, 2008
    Holyfield should of quit 5 years ago, he isnt doing his legacy any good and may end up being hurt!
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Nothing he does now will hurt his legacy, but I'd hate to see him hurt. He's one of my favourite fighters.

    I have him top 40 on my ATG p4p list. That's a fair ranking IMO, and just.
     
  5. Genesis

    Genesis Undisputed Full Member

    238
    3
    Oct 20, 2009
    He should have quit after the Lewis fight, but why on earth does he still get title shots at 46? How many title shots has he had since losing to Lewis at 37?
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,036
    8,779
    Jul 15, 2008
    Who ranks him low ? He was a mid (7 or 8) top ten all time heavyweight ... along with Ali he fought the best heavyweight competition that ever lived.
     
  7. Briscoe

    Briscoe Active Member Full Member

    941
    6
    Sep 19, 2009
    I can't agree and say he's underrated. He's not. We're all aware of his exploits in the ring, and we're aware of his struggles at the end. His inconsistency is his main fault and it's what places him among the Jersey Joe Walcotts of the world (not a bad place to be). He'll be remembered for quite some time for his warrior spirit in the ring.
     
  8. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    THis is a pretty shitty post. If he had Lennox Lewis comp he would have dominated the same. Likewise if Lewis had Holy's he may have been a commentator by the mid 90's.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,556
    Nov 24, 2005
    I would rate him above Tyson and Lewis personally.
     
  10. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    me too
     
  11. mochabuzz

    mochabuzz Active Member Full Member

    589
    84
    Mar 3, 2005
    Never have i seen a more motivated fighter than holyfield... He had an amazing desire to win. He accomplished alot for a guy who didn't have a huge punch at heavyweight. IMO he is top 10 all time HW & the best Cruiserweight of all time.
     
  12. North Star

    North Star Member Full Member

    130
    1
    Mar 10, 2006
    I don't think Holyfield is an underated heavyweight but perhaps some people do not always realize how remarkable his accomplishments are for someone with the tools he had to work with. In public Holyfield is a rather quiet person and not controversial and I think that has something to do with him being a bit of an overlooked heavyweight.

    The first time Holyfield beat Tyson was fascinating. I was amazed how often Holyfield narrowly managed to keep Tyson's blows from landing hard enough to cause serious trouble. Holyfield again and again in that fight kept himself in the slightly wrong place from Tyson's point of view, but Holyfield still had to be in great shape, smart, clever and very determined to survive so many slightly off target punches from the hard hitting Tyson.
     
  13. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    Holyfield didn't have one rpime and then a decline, he was going up and down. The Holyfield from the 2nd Lewis fight certainly looked a lot shaprer that the one who struggled with tiny Bobby Chyz. When he beat Tyson, he looked a lot better than when he lost to Moorer.

    I don't see him beating Lewis, ever. Lewis was never outpointed and Holyfield didn't have the punch to KO him.
     
  14. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    I disagree Holyfield had an easy title win with a fat, unfocused Douglas who was a shell of the man who beat Tyson. He fought with tremendous heart against Bowe and Moorer but lost to them when they were in shape. Lewis would have dominanted Moorer and already KO'd Bowe with headgear in the Olympics and we ll know how eager Bowe was to avoid Lewis. Holyfield struggles with the ancient versions of Holmes and Foreman, who would have been beaten up badly by Lewis. I also don't see Holyfield blow out Ruddock or Golota or KO Bruno. Holyfield had a hard time with Bobby Chyz who wouldn't have touched Lewis.

    Lewis had his two dramatic KO losses and that wouldn't have happened to Holyfield because of his rion chin. But over their respective careers, Lewis handled quality opposition in much more dominant fashion than Holyfield.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Your post is full of would of's and should of's. Bowe didnt get knocked out with headgear on. The fight was stopped (prematurely in my opinion). You can watch it for yourself on youtube. You cant say how Lewis would have done against "ancient versions of Holmes and Foreman" because he never fought them. One thing is clear, he was knocked out by two fighters who werent even in the category of ancient Holmes and Foreman. He struggled with Ray Mercer, who lost to "ancient Holmes" as well. Your idea of dominating quality opposition is vastly different than mine.