why do people put duran ahead of pac on atg list???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by st762410, Nov 18, 2009.


  1. st762410

    st762410 Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    not everyone thinks like you.:nono
     
  2. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    :good
     
  3. st762410

    st762410 Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    thanks 4 asking. my criteria is smiple: FIGHT THE GREATS IN YOUR ERA. BEAT THE GREATS IN YOUR ERA. u cant fight the greats in another era---thats impossible. people should stop making the comparison of manny fighting durans opponents, or duran himself. u can make subjective opinions, but none of it is fact, and never will be. however, when u are given the opportunity 2 fight a great IN YOUR ERA, u must win, if u want to be considered an elite great yourself. with all due respect to moore, barkley, buchanan, dejesus, etc...their not considered one of the greats during durans era. fair enough?? we know who the greats were. they were the ones who gave duran the most trouble. and they should----THATS WHY THEIR GREAT! duan lost to them.
    we all know who the greats are during mannys era---and guess what??? THEY WERE ALL BIGGER THAN HIM. bigger meaning, manny had to move up in weight 2 fight them 4 their respective titles. so please stop with the excuse of hagler or hearns being to big 4 duran, even if they were. manny did it---and won.....and now, is the only man ever to hold 7 titles at the same time.
    ULTIMATELY, if manny lost to mab, jmm, em, cotto, etc...i would never put manny in the top 20 of the all time great list. duran doesnt meet that criteria. thats why, to me, mannys ahead of him; and why durans not in the top 20 atg list. i love duran!! he's one of my fav fighters of all time!:bbb i just dont have him as high as alot of people have him.:bbb
     
  4. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    391
    Jun 14, 2006
    Horribly flawed criteria. I take it you rank Marco Antonio Barrera above Roberto Duran too? :lol:
     
  5. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    :good
     
  6. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Lightweight:

    Hiroshi Kobayashi (Slightly past prime)
    Ernesto Marcel (Future conquerer of the late great Alexis Arguello)
    Prime Ken Buchanan
    Esteban De Jesus x2 (Pretty much primed on both occassions)

    Welterweight: (Bare in mind from here on we are past his best weight)

    Carlos Palamino (Close to prime, pushed Wilfred Benitez very close 5 months previous)
    Prime Sugar Ray Leonard (You don't need telling a top 20 ATG and top 5 ATG welterweight)

    Light-Middle

    Pipino Cuevas (Slightly past prime)
    Davey Moore (Primed, not great but beat Ayub Kalule, one of Leonard's better wins)

    Middleweight (Bare in mind we are now talking about past-prime Duran, and now 25lbs above his best weight)


    Pushes a prime Marvin Hagler very close (Hagler obviously a top 35 ATG, and a top 4 MW)
    Beats prime Iran Barkley (Just beat Hearns, even directly afterwards took a prime Michael Nunn to a MD)

    Longetivity - Produced excellent wins from 1972 to 1989, across 3 different weight classes and a 25lb disparity

    H2H - Brutal offensively and excellent defensively, ranks up there with the best at LW and would beat many a good WW
     
  7. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,683
    8,147
    Feb 11, 2005
    Heard of them, yeah...:D

    They aren't on the same level, historically, or in terms of relevance as the 80's version of the Fantastic Four.
     
  8. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,683
    8,147
    Feb 11, 2005
    Nice. When you factor into account the fact that Duran beat a whole hell of a lot of solid contenders to go along with those names (Saoul Mamby, Hector Thompson, Guts Ishimatsu, Vilomar Fernandez, Ray Lampkin, Edwin Viruet at lightweight/ jr. welterweight just for starters, all the way up to Jorge Castro at middleweight when he was long past his physical prime), his resume looks pretty damned good.

    Pac might be able to get there, if he keeps fighting top shelf talent. But he's not there yet.
     
  9. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    212
    Feb 5, 2005

    That's a nice summary. It isn't going to change a couple of Pac fanatics minds, but a nice summary anyway. Obviously while Ali was losing to Spinks at 37, Duran's win over Barkley appears to be meaningless to some on this board. Let's see if Pac is even fighting at 38, nevermind beating middleweights. Hell I'd settle for a 38 year old Pac still being able to beat wweights.
     
  10. MindstateC88

    MindstateC88 Member Full Member

    122
    0
    Jul 19, 2008
    how can u compare duran to pac??? foolishness....
     
  11. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    He beat the conquerer of Arguello and Hearns, but he didn't beat Hearns when he did fight Hearns. And he never fought Arguello. Beating someone who beat a great is not really that impressive. Sometimes guys have a good style matchup, yet then never beat another great fighter like Barkley against Hearns. You have beat a great to be great. Not beat a guy who beat a guy who beat that great. If that was the criteria, every fighter would be great. Cuevas was not a big contender when Duran fought him. Pushing Hagler to the limit he still didn't beat him, and other guys gave Hagler good fights, doesn't boost their ranking. And Barkley lost to Kalambay,Nunn and Benn in the same time period Duran beat him. What you are describing is more like top 25 than top 10. He lacks the great wins against an ATG.. He should have beaten Hearns and Benitez at 154 and that might have done it. But he didn't . How can you warrant top 10.. This is what I am about. If you are saying these points to say he was great he was, but to be top 10 he has to beat the ATG's like Hearns and Hagler and Benitez regardless of excuses. If Kessler makes an excuse about losing to Ward last night and said he was out of shape, would it matter?
     
  12. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    14
    May 24, 2006
    duran beat SRL and made it to 168

    Calling pac a 106 lb fighter is very misleading. You could call him a 122 lb guy when factoring in thats what he was at adulthood and other guys like PBF would have been under 120 if they started pro at 16.
     
  13. Deew

    Deew Active Member Full Member

    1,318
    776
    May 4, 2009
    Nailed down.

    The sole reason that boxing means what it does to me was a shitty old VHS of "The Best of Roberto Duran" I was given as a young kid.

    The man is a living legend.
     
  14. st762410

    st762410 Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    flawed because duran doesnt meet that criteria? perhaps the criteria should be "fight the greats in your era, lose to the greats in your era." now is that a more accurate criteria?? i would have 2 respectfully disagree. :bbb
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,015
    20,617
    Sep 15, 2009
    For 18 months people have been trying to help mag see the greatness of duran, hopefully one day he'll get it!