Hatton Bashing

Not at all, it would be impressive from a stats point of view. You like to take things out of context, your so biased against any other view point that it harms your abilty to think rationally.

If i had it my way Pac would have fought in about 4 weight divisions not 7 or so.......and the man would be a 4 weight champ which would still be impressive and not the the over hyped, over inflated records that we have today becuase we have 17 divisions.

Wouldnt you be mad if fighter X fought -

Robert Guerrero IBF Super-feather 130
Ali Fuenka Vacant IBF lightweight 135
M. Khan WBA Light-welter 140
Isaac Hlatshwayo IBF Welterweight 147
Y. Foreman WBA Light-middle 154

and then proclaimed himself a 5 weight champ and all time great?

I mean fighter X of a decent world level abilty could literally milk the fans dry by pretending to be something he is not, just taking advantage of diluted divisions boxing offers......the best will always find a way to win....this is what Pacman has shown, he has beaten 3 men who were all naturally bigger than him.

 

really can't see hatton not being in anyones top 15 british fighters,bit confuseing to a man like myself:huh


(well ok,betty swollocks,he would have peter buckley before hatton:yep)

 

...I'm laughing, but its true

 

Manny would be a four weight champ? IIRC you had no weight divisions under 126lbs and then just 2 divisions from 126lbs to 160lbs?? That makes him 2 weight world champ at best. You're just making this **** up as you go along.

The examples you use in the above post are extreme and ridiculous, why would anyone think a fighter who had won against that list of fighters was an ATG? Even if he did proclaim it himself? Does anyone call Dingaan Thobela an ATG (look him up if you've never heard of him)?

 

Depends how you look at that I think, if you're talking titles the only ones that really count are the Lonsdale and IBF which he won from Tszyu. The rest were pure paper.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Is that post supposed to make any sense whatsoever (bar the odd childish insult)? I can just about decipher that you seem to have sand in your knickers about something or other but lifes too short to waste on your stream of conciousness ramblings. I take it English isn't your first language?

Like I say, feel free to continue with your pointless and laughably transparent little crusade to restructure the weight divisions.

Although I would point out that in the course of our discussions you've gone from 4 or 5 divisions being needed to 8 or 10 so I suppose I've at least made you see SOME sense. Are you planning to backtrack any further or are you firm on those figures now?

 

Face it Gaz, you have met your nemesis.

He's like MrPlow to your Jeff Thomas.

Just seems to have taken an irrational dislike to you. It'll pass.:good

 

Its quite flattering really.....

 

I bet it is, you lucky *******.

I wish I had my own MrPlow.

 

Your getting allies in the hyper real world :hi:

Back tracking,

Revisionist history going at Eastside boxing.

I dont dislike you, i dont know you, it just your moronic constant drival and attempts at getting to me who you dont know, whilst trying to somehow convey to everyone who you dont know that your some how above all this when in reality you know this has all started becuase you overate certain british fighters.

Are you going to tell me, Hatton is a worthy 2 weight champ?

Do you honestly believe there is a need for 17 weight divisions in boxing?

 

Well done D-Mac i saw the relevancy in your post.

:happy We all ove cheer leaders, let get a pretend party going on you guys, hopefully Gaz you get more fanboys trying to subtle back you up.


You have never answered the simple questions Gaz

 

Hatton is a one weight champ and has a belt at another weight. Its not the fact theres too many weight divisions that has given Hatton too many titles, its the fact there are too many governing bodies, thats how he got his welterweight title. He 140 title is legit, his 147 title isn't.

I don't know enough about Oriental boxing to know whether the lightest weights are needed but I'd say the ones from Fly upwards are needed.

I don't overate certain British fighters, I've told you time and time again that IMHO Hatton is no more and no less than a decent enough, but not great, world champion but you just keep trying make out I've said Hatton is some sort of ATG

And BTW, if you are going to call someone for posting "moronic drivel" then it looks a lot better if you are intelligent enough yourself to spell the word "drivel" correctly.

 

You only posted them 2 minutes ago....atsch

 

This content is protected