ya i agree with him top 20 is a good number for Haye, definitely. You can't deny David Haye is one of the best boxers ever. He would have a very great chance and for sure beat most of them any heavyweight that has ever lived.
I'm gonna give you guys the benefit of the doubt and say that you are kidding when you place Haye anywhere near the top 50 all time among the heavyweights, let alone p4p.
i assume this thread is kind of a joke but i'll humor you.... if haye beats both klitchko's, defends the belt for 4 or 5 yrs and a young hvy with an olympic gold metal and undefeated record come along making haye a huge underdog, and haye outclasses him and ko's him, we can talk atg. even then top 40. so far he has been a very good cruiser,and a hvy with potential. but thats it.
Haye's best wins at cruiser were Fragomeni and Mormeck. He must have been the most unimpressive and non-dominating unified cruiser champ in recent memory since he didn't come close to dominating that division. He has failed to fight Cunningham, Huck, Afolabi, Erdei, and Adamek, all of which are superior to Mormeck and Fragomeni. Even at cruiser his resume sucks. So he beat Valuev in a candidate for "Worst Fight of the Year". . .so did Chagaev and, arguably, granpa Holyfield and a fading Ruiz as well. I am not impressed at all by Haye at this point in time.