Who gives a **** if it was legit or not, he won, took the belt away from Valuev-that's enough for me.
No. I think he just indicated to him that there was a camera on him. Which is only fair as Haye could have said or done things that he didn't want public. I'm not talking about anything sinister, just swearing etc.
So any mention of the injury is 'needless and pathetic'. Yet: 1. This thread is, ironically, an allegation that Haye was caught in a situation where he did not intend to be seen. 2. You don't want to hear about it, as it is so pathetic and needless, yet you felt the need to take the time to post on the matter. Multiple times.
That is not what I said at all. I would have probably took that up with the OP. I will assume that this is what you think, in which case I disagree with you.
If Haye said he broke his hand, I believe him. In any event, a win is a win. Now fight a Klitscko. I don't want to see a Valuev rematch, a Ruiz fight and rematch, a Mormeck rematch, a Holyfield fight, a Hopkins fight, or a fight with a Liverpool cabdriver named Clive.
the cast needed for that injury is not a full cast.. it is a half cast that covers from halfway across the top/back of the hand, round to halfway across the palm. the aim of the cast is to stop joint movement at the knuckle. it can be slipped on and off as is not set all the way around. depending on how it is held in place, i.e. with velcro straps, bandaging etc
he took the cast off to show khan. meanwhile some guy was talking whilst this was happening, so khan might have just asked to see his hand or something as basic as that. **** me people bring up the most ******ed **** as if it is important. the saying to make mountains out of molehills comes to mind.