People say Pac's One Dimensional.....

:rofl:rofl
This has nothing to do with who's better. Whitaker and chavez defenitely are better fighters than morales and barrera but that has nothing to do with my point.

My point is just like pacman, oscar fought chavez and whitaker at the end of their career like pacman did against barrera and morales yet you give no credit to pacman when it comes to those 2 wins. You do nothing but hate and says negative things about pacman.

chavez-Whitaker - not the same fighter they were by the time oscar fought them
Barrera-Morales -not the same fighter they were by the time pac got to them yet you do nothing but hate on pacman claiming he fought past prime fighters while your hero oscar did the same againt whitaker and chavezatsch
:roll:

 

Pac is one dimensional, but that one dimension is all he needs.

Insane speed coming from all angles. End of story!

 

Mosley was the man to beat at WW. Cotto got a contreversial W over Mosley, and Cotto was beaten to submission before Pac fought him. After the Clottey fight everyone knew Cotto wasn't the same fighter.

Before I saw Cotto against Clottey I still gave Cotto a chance to beat Pac. But after I saw the Clottey fight I am on record saying that Cotto would get KO. Obviously he never fully recovered from the Margarito beating. Oh, and Mosley is and always will be greater than Cotto in every sense.

:rofl:rofl:rofl Erik Morales had just lost decisively against an aging Barrera, and had gotten beaten by a journey man in Zahir Raheem. EM lost 5 of his last 6 fights for crying outloud, and the Pac loss was the FOURTH fight IN!!!! atsch Doofus. :yep

Cotto and Hatton are decent fighters, very good fighters in this era, but overall decent fighters.

 

again..ur taking it as i'm talking ****....go to your local gym and watch some fighters...start talking to some trainers..it isn't bad to be 1 dimensional...

 

i dont think he is one dimensional but i do not believe he has an arsenal such as Floyd who can fight anywhere...in the pocket, comming forward, on the ropes, going backwards, potshots, in and out, uses a variety of punches when necessary(his uppercut is deadly although he hasnt used it since 135 i believe), combos are brilliant again when he uses them(see hatton fight as well as 130-135 fights), i mean he just has so many options and thats why he wins a lot because he just adapts to whatever the fighter does.....and he will need it against PAC for sure.

Although PAC is not as polished as Floyd what PAC does no one else can do and PAC does it on the level that Floyd uses his skills its just that i think floyd has a wide arsenal.

 

For the gazillionth time, STOP making **** up!

I never said I have Oscar MAD props for beating Chavez and Whitaker.

The difference between DLH and Pac is that Whitaker and Chavez do NOT define DLH's career. Whereas EM and MAB are arguably Pac's greatest wins.

YET Whiatker ad Chavez ARE STILL better wins, for many reasons.

 

His one dimension is out of this world. (no really it all the roids)

 

Morales (2 8) and (Barrera ( 29) was younger than Chaves and Whitaker when Pac got em.

Not packy fault your hero were SHOT AT 30 homie. Packy pushing 30 + soon still going homie!!

 

Lets do this!!!!!! :happy:happy:happy

Do I have to come in weightdrained??? :yep

 

How is beating a shot to pieces Chavez better than beating MAB?

 

Really can we put all this roid **** away. There is no evidence that Pac has done steroids even though fighters are tested before and after a fight and no one on Pac's camp has ever had any accusations brought against them. Given this what reason to we have to believe that he is on steroids especially since there are really none of the normal signs associated with steroid use?

 

Stop making **** up?atsch so u never said pac fought past prime barrera and morales? :nut You hate pac and does nothing but bring down his accomplishments. Always saying negative things about pacman especially the barrera win.