why has Bell enterd the equation here when we're talking about the fat plonker on the left of your picture and the nicest boxer to have graced the game ?
Becuase I need to have consistency in debates. My brain can't comprehend inconsistancy so please help me out. Are we using the same scale to judge these two as we used to judge Bell? I'm happy to call these two ****, but on the same scale where would Bell feature? Just curious like.
Not seen either of their recent fights so cant really comment, from the results though it seems Arthur has let things slip, and maybe doesn't have his heart in it anymore.
****ing useless? there still both top 10 material domestically (not seen AA's latest tho), I'd hardly say everyone below then was "****ing useless" either.