War between two skilled boxers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by randeris, Dec 16, 2009.


  1. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008

    Duran was a slugger?? LMAO. Nonsense. As a former lightweight, You don't take arguably the greatest middleweight of all time 15 rounds.

    and you don't win a belt at middleweight at the age of 38 being a slugger.
     
  2. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008

    Gtfo. 'Just sluggers'. Just because Duran did't do the shoulder roll don't mean he was not exceptionally skilled. Sick and tired of people giving credit to fighters who are flashy and class them as being more skilled.
     
  3. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    :good My sentiments exactly.
     
  4. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    LOL at Hagler and Duran being "purely brawlers"
     
  5. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008

    Thats actually one of the dumbest things i've ever heard. I mean Hagler was a switch hitter for goodness sake-extremely balanced and comfortable fighting in stance.

    I often wonder what some people on ESB are watching.
     
  6. yyyy1313

    yyyy1313 Active Member Full Member

    1,475
    0
    Mar 29, 2007
    Naw, he means when both fighters game plan are to counter.

    Personally don't see any fights to be entertaining if both fighters are trying to counter one another. Especially since it takes one person to initiate the battle. Kind of a meh question if you ask me.
     
  7. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,364
    542
    Sep 14, 2008
    Good call
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,889
    3,266
    Jun 30, 2005
    Not true. Hagler was largely a boxer for the great majority of his career. The Hearns fight was a big change, out of necessity due to Hearns's dimensions and outside boxing skills, from the way Hagler usually fought.

    Duran was a versatile fighter who could be a pressure fighter, or box patiently at range and beat guys that way. In the Dejesus rubber match, he showed both, first winning the fight with his boxing skills at range, then turning the pressure up later in the fight.
     
  10. haglerforever

    haglerforever Member Full Member

    392
    1
    Dec 6, 2009

    [QUOTE
    Duran was a fantastic fighter, but not what i meant by "skilled boxer", same goes for Hagler.They were more sluggers

    What the f***. these guys are amongst the most skilled boxers ever,maybe not the cutest or fastest or slickest.F**K.

    hearns hagler

    duran leonard
     
  11. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,889
    3,266
    Jun 30, 2005
    People have a tendency to watch a fight and some selected highlights of a certain fighter, and think they ALWAYS fought like that, and that defined their style.

    I wonder if people years from now are going to watch Mayweather-Judah and say "Mayweather was a stalker who walked down his opponents" or watch Cotto's bouts with Abdullaev and Margarito and say "Cotto was a runner who seldom took a forward step".
     
  12. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Rarely have I ever seen the combination of skill, ferocity, and shear brutality that the first Arguello/Pryor fight provided.
     
  13. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008

    Close thread. :good
     
  14. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Mayweather/Corley round 4 was Gatti/Ward-esque
     
  15. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    I think we've misunderstood eachother here. They were exceptionally skilled too. What i meant was; if you divide boxers up in the following categories: Boxer (Muhammad Ali), Slugger (Joe Frazier, Mike Tyson etc) i would have to put Hagler and Duran in the 2nd category. I never said "purely brawlers" as someone said. I am a big fan of Duran, and i meant no discredit. He was incrediby skilled, talented etc, but i would still have to classify him as a slugger or aggressor if you like. It might have taken a negative sound to it at ESB, but i have always understood it simply as some being boxers, some being sluggers. Nothing negative about either. The point is that Duran and Hagler are likely to be the agressive guys in there, while the boxers are going to be "on the retreat", countering etc. Very rough categories i know, and some do both things, but what i meant in the opening post was two fighters one would classify as boxers with those two categories. Anyone here ever played Title Bout? The categories that they have, Boxer, Slugger and Either as a showing of what style a fighter is, is what i meant. Nothing negative. ATG fighters with amazing skill. Hope that clears it out. :smooch

    Edit: Using these categories, among the fab 4: Leonard, Hearns, Hagler and Duran would most likely all be either, but with the last two having an edge towards the slugger side.