A question for everyone that I asked in a different thread...

Keep deflecting.

We're talking about Pacquiao refusing suitable drug testing. Try to focus.

 

In regards to Oscar, yea I know what freddie said.. He said all of it before the fight and Oscar still took it. Plenty of fighters have been draining themselves for years.. Whats you're point? Manny did it for years, or do you believe he's a natural 130lber too. Manny fought a great fighter at the welterweight limit, one who was way favored to beat him, and Manny TKO'd him.

The Cotto fight was a welterweight fight, Cotto agreed to a catchweight within the Welterweight division. It was a lb less than what he VOLUNTARILY made for the Clottey fight. Manny manhandled him

The fact is you can believe what u want to, but these two wins are what has many boxing journalists giving him a chance against Mayweather.
Do U understand?

 

I don't know if he's taking roids or not, and those weights may or may not mean ****.

What I do know is that he doesn't want a blood test, first because he has a needle phobia, then because having it done 3 days before the fight weakens him, but then for some apperant reason doesn't want it 14 days because who knows why the **** NOT!

 

1. Yes, Oscar agreed to the limit. It doesn't change the fact that Oscar had no life in him come fight night.

2. The Cotto fight was a 145lbs fight which is within the Welterweight range but is not a true Welterweight fight.

3. Any boxing journalist using the De La Hoya fight to make a judgment about how Manny will do with Mayweather should find another profession.

 

You just killed the arguement .

 

Because African American's are naturally bigger than Asians.

 

wtf? poor widdowmaker has been saying over and over and over again that pac agreed to 3 blood tests, 60-days worth of **** tests, plus give hair samples. is that not being "test under stricter guidelines"?

*****s are taking the 14-day cutoff as gospel, bunch of sheep.

 

Thank you, my friend. I enjoy punching holes in bad arguments.

 

You're right!!!

If the two ever fight, someone should insist they both get tested for PED's, I'm sure Floyd would never agree to this given that he is not clean.:deal

 

The 14-day cutoff is actually lenient. It's a compromise to which Pacquiao would not agree.

 

I suppose in lieu of providing a compelling argument it suffices for you to just say everyone except those who agree with you are ignorant. Nice work.

 

and 24 days (plus the post-fight test, plus 60-days worth of ****, plus hair test) is reasonable, and a compromise to which floyd would not agree.
pac is only obligated by nevada to do, what, 1 **** test post-fight? [correct me if that's wrong, but the point is the terms that pac agreed to is already way way above what the rules require].
and these floydette morons give this stupid argument that the 14-day cutoff was the better compromise cause it's halfway between the 30-day cutoff and testing all the way to the fight. pac has already agreed to 1000x the actual requirements.

 

http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/Th...ossible?_why_steroid_accusations_are_baseless

GREAT article. Level thinking on display.

 

Why are Manny's arms shorter now?