Who is a better ATG vitali or wlad?

Hater statement at its best.

I have seem some stupid **** about the brothers writen by haters but your the 1st that actually thinks "they both hurt the sport":huh

What a crock of ****.

 

I'm sorry, there seems to have been sort of error in posting. It cut off before you addressed the content of what I wrote. All that I can see is the part that is trite name calling.

 

Oh so they hurt the sport how???? Should they show up out of shape and undetermined like Arreola?? I think Americans are so desperate for an American champ and that's why they hate the Klitschkos. Plus the Klitschkos are well mannered, have PhD's, and can speak several languages. So if they're bad for the sport then who should be the champs right now? :think

 

Are you unable to read my earlier post because of some problem with scrolling? Or are you just unable to understand the premises of an argument unless they are explictly stated? If so, then let me help you.

Premise 1: Heavyweight champions which are boring hurt the sport
Premise 2: Heavyweight champions which refuse unification hurt the sport
Premise 3: They do both of the above things
Conclusion: They hurt the sport

Do you think that those are the only two choices? Because I don't.

I think that is a crass generalization that reveals a sadly nationalist view of the world.

Really? Are they also witty but totally down-to-earth and relatable? Because I don't care.

Somebody not hurtful to the sport. That's just common sense.

 

Most say Wlad is the champ now.

I don't care which way you have it, as long as one is picked.

 

its your opinion they are boring...many disagree with you

Unification...Wlad is the first to unify some of the belts in the last 9+ years... you make it seem as if unification is some easy thing to pull off. In this day and age of boxing, its almost impossible with contracts, money splits, alphabets not wanting it.

They are brothers. When Vitali retires, you will see Wlad going full steam ahead for TOTAL unification

 

Wlad not doubt.

He unifies and with boxing politice he would be the WBA Champion too. He fights Chagaev but this belt was not on the line.

 

I think Wlad is the better boxer, harder puncher he's beat better competition but still H2H I'd pick Big brother to win atleast the best version of him.

 

Redundant question, neither of them qualify as an atg

 

That they are boring is just your opinion, that they don't unify titles by fighting eachother probably hurts their own legacy more than anything else, just imagine how people would see Vitaly as a champion if he where to knock out Wladimir at this stage.

 

Yeah... the Klitschkos are boring. We all know that fans hate seeing knockouts. That is all those boring brothers do. Go into the ring... completely dominate their opponents both mentally and physically... and then stop them. So boring. As a boxing fan, I just hate when some Champions puts on a master boxing display of controlling the pace, timing, range, and distance.... picks their opponent apart as he breaks them down mentally as well... and then stops them. I mean... who watches boxing for that? I would much rather watch David Haye vs Valuev every day. I mean... all of the same people that call the Klitschkos boring are the same guys who brag about how amazing exciting David Haye is.

 

Neither all time great(yet)...........but vitali over wlad...

 

If Vitali had not lost 4 years..............wow! Vitali is a true warrior. I remember as a kickboxer and wow!!!!!!!

I consider them both champions and will not pick the better. Vitali is so much better than most really know.


KlitschkoooooooooooooOOOoOOooOOOooOoooOoOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

 

Wishful thinking paulieboy. I say Bowe never gets inside & gets his ass handed to him by Wladimir. After all, Golota used a lesser jab & lesser power to beat Bowe a new ass.

 

PhillySmell, you are welcome to watch the other weight classes if you can't handle the Heavyweights.