No it is because he was facing Jones and everyone looks slow next to Jones, with the hand/foot speed and reactions
Nah disagree, you can still see speed the same and Toney's wasn't there (obv losing 44lbs in six weeks isn't the best prep for a world title boxing match). With Jones you'd just see more speed
The thing is Berry you'll look faster against an easier to hit opponent that you dont have to chase around the ring. Jones took out the same Thornton out in 2rounds that went 12 with Toney. Toney always had to lose allot of weight quickly for his fights, do we really think his training/diet was worse for Jones than say Barkley?
i think eubanks could beat mcclellan but really not such a done deal. against toney he would have lost a close decision. against jones i think also like with toney. with hopkins i don't know and who cares ? hopkins fights are MMA and he says it's gay..
He didn't take Thornton. Thornton's shoulder went against the ropes in the 3rd and he couldn't punch back, out of Jones's 30-punch flurry very few actually landed.
Eubank was capable of beating them all (note i said capable) Pre Watson = Eubank putting on a show (being underdog he was always quality) and prehaps scoring a knockout Post Watson = Very boring fight with eubank prehaps winning on points he could have done it, i couldn't see anyone scoring a physical knockout against him, maybe, and it is a BIG maybe a TKO