$ Mayweather has signed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PBFred, Feb 3, 2010.


  1. badger6

    badger6 Ask your wife !!! Full Member

    1,211
    0
    May 6, 2007
    I could say the same about non standard and non mandated drug tests. But I won't
     
  2. Pro

    Pro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,773
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    AAAAYYYYEEE!!!!! LET'S GO!!!

    Shane about to get that ass tapped come May 1st please believe it cause its true!
     
  3. cmkb

    cmkb Member Full Member

    272
    0
    Jun 12, 2005
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr7x9iizQVs[/ame] <- starting at 3:55.. looks like Floyd is ******* at heart. :rofl
     
  4. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Mayweather mafia avatar?!?!
    God damnit.
     
  5. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    LOL!!!!!

    This is just evidence that floyd fans picked the wrong guy to defend.
     
  6. GeorgeJ

    GeorgeJ Puncher is born not made Full Member

    440
    0
    Oct 31, 2007
    WOOHOO!!!! Let the madness begin!
     
  7. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
  8. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    That is crazy. If someone asked for it and were denied, they should just drop it. However, if the other party agrees to it and then keeps coming with sill excuses for why they need to amend the testing requirements, and then continue to balk at the test even after their proposed ammendments are met by the other party, then that situation is totally different. In that case, the party backing out on their word and refusing to comprimise, would be at fault.
     
  9. badger6

    badger6 Ask your wife !!! Full Member

    1,211
    0
    May 6, 2007

    Going by that logic, if they both have never had trouble and won't have trouble making weight. Then the overweight penalty won't even be a factor. And if it is not a factor then it doesn't show that someone doesn't want the fight. It shows that they are concerned that the other fighter wants an unfair weight advantage, therefore there should be a stiff penalty !!!
     
  10. jonnytightlips

    jonnytightlips Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,384
    1
    Aug 1, 2008
    Great ****in news. Im backing Floyd to take it.
     
  11. Pro

    Pro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,773
    0
    Oct 7, 2007

    Oh yea...we in the building.

    GunRule's finest....
     
  12. Detroit

    Detroit Get Money Full Member

    2,655
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    :lol:...:verysad
     
  13. badger6

    badger6 Ask your wife !!! Full Member

    1,211
    0
    May 6, 2007
    We're not talking about Pac here. Were talking about Mosley. I just hope that if he agreed to non standard drug testing that he covered his own ass with a stiff overweight clause. Going by your logic, if Mosley ain't roiding and Mayweather makes weight since he "doesn't have a problem making 147", then all is good and everyone is covered !!!!!
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I dissagree. Even if a fighter has never had problems making weight, there's a first time for everything. If the fighter agrees to the penalty and then gets sick or hurt, and misses some training, he could possibly come in slightly overweight. Dirrell had never had problems making weight and was like a fraction of a lb. over the limit. He of course lost the weight and made weight on his second try. Let's say Froch had insituted say a $1 mill per lb. penalty, Dirrell would be out $1 mill even though he eventually made weight. Overweight clauses are only neccesary in catchweight bouts or non title bouts. There's no reson to have them in a title belt between two guys from the same weight class who are fighting at the weightclass limit.
     
  15. hewito

    hewito Guest

    and some head gear as well!