My money is still with Pac. I didn't say he was gonna lose, I just said it wouldn't be an easy fight and that he will have a tougher night than he did with Cotto.
when will people learn... it's not the size but rather the speed and skills. "he can't handle your speed, son..." - roach
Clottey's going to look normal @ the weigh-in after he dries out. You won't really notice the difference til his muscles rehydrate and he gets in the ring.
Ya if that happens the steroid rumors will really start coming. Mayweather could probably use Pac knocking out Clottey as proof in court why hes on the juice.
Also, for good measure: "there is no point continuing with this; he is too fast" - Ignacio Beristain, from the same fight.
he looks big...so what? cotto was bigger than pac and look what happened, lacy was bigger than calslappy and look what happened :yep.
Because I bring up names doesn't necessarily mean I'm comparing the mentioned fighters. My point is looks can be deceiving and it's very possible for a smaller man to dominate someone who appears physically intimidating.
calzaghe was the bigger man :huh .. hehe, nah i see what your saying mate! :nut like i said, timing wil be what wins it for pacquiao!
I thinks it laughable that people are using Lacy's non-skilled, no-defense-havin ass to make the point about discounting Clottey. Clottey's size matters because it is a good indication of what Pac will have to go through in order to do this breaking down of the body Roach talked about (and Philla believes in). Couple that with the fact that he actually does have an iron chin and you should begin to realize that Pac ain't steamrollin **** on March 13th.