**RJJ as a LHW during the period between 74 thru 85**

Nice try. No one is dodging it. We have read this book already. You simply want to argue more about Jones when your viewpoint is clear already. You will prove nothing more nor will anyone else by entering this discussion.

 

:deal

Plain and simple that is the truth.

Foster and Spinks may beat him. But he has more than a fair chance to beat them as well.

The rest he beats.

But what does it matter....whatever we say. Whatever facts we bring up. Whatever opinions we express. Your mind is made up on your biased opinion so nothing will change.

:naughty

 

If you wanted to do a tribute, then you next post shouldn't have been about RJJ fans and how the subject was avoided. You would have been looking for any objective opinion and not for RJJ fans.

Spinks can beat him. Jones could beat Spinks. I favor Spinks at 175. Jones would be favored over the rest of them.

 

This is the long and the short of it. Roy Jones is one of the greatest fighters of all time period. He beat the best there was in his era, and in most cases it was not even close. No one knows how anyone would have faired in another era. To the best of my knowledge, no one has cracked the time space continueum , so as always the era debate is hypothetical. I think RJJ on his best day could have beaten any LHW that ever lived. And on their best day, the elite lhw could have beaten him. No one is unbeatable, no one. If he did loose, who ever beat him would have to earn it and take some lumps in the process. 50-4 38 kos, enough said. Champ at 4 different weight classes.

 

Jones would have beaten all of them except Michael Spinks in my opinion. Matthew Saad Muhammad and Dwight Muhammad Qawi would have made for fun fights, but Roy would have beaten them.

 

I think Matthew Saad Muhammad would have beaten him and Victor Galindez would have a 50/50 shot too.

 

You have to admit that it is not out of the question that Roy beats them all.

 

See what I mean. I could have wrote that for you since I knew that was your whole point to begin with.

 

depends if he was on the steroids or not

 

He didn't need steroids to comfortably beat Hopkins or dominate Toney