Floyd's Haters need to realize something.

I am not going to debate the whole PBF thing. I just want to comment on your logic.

Being in the P4P list has nothing to do if the opponent will be difficult or not for a given fighter. Pac can fight Chris John tomorrow at 140. Would that be a hard fight for Pac?

No disrespect to John but was just trying to make a point.

 

The ones that say he fights smaller guys are Margarito fans, as ironic as it looks. Yeah, Margarito, the one who made a career calling out, cheating and losing to guys half his size.

Regarding Mayweather, how can he make a career moving up successfully in weight, winning titles in 5 different divisions(lineal in 3) fighting smaller guys?

 

I had this EXACT SAME ARGUMENT last year...Been there, done that, even bought a T-Shirt and I'm never going back for a visit. At least not with The ESB Posters. They don't seem to understand nor comprehend Common Sense and Logic.

Good Luck Though...you make a good argument.

 

Oscar and Judah were on the p4p list when they fought Floyd? you got a source for that cause I doubt it.

Hatton and Marquez were on the p4p list but that was when they were at 140 and 135, respectively. If they fought at WW all the time, they would have dropped off the p4p list in no time.

that's not hating, just telling it like I see it, cause there's too many double standards on this board

 

Marquez was a smaller man, no argument there. But Hatton was a big time weight cutter who showed up on fight night in the 150's while Floyd was fighting a WW weighing in on fight night between 147-149. Hatton was the same size but he was used to fighting weaker and less skilled opponents at Jr. WW.

For people who say Floyd fights little guys, what's the explanation for the other 38 fights he fought?

 

hey man I'm not saying that Hatton was not a big time weight cutter. What I'm saying is that Hatton was inside the top10 p4p list because of how good he was 140. For some reason he was able to cut down to 140 and be stronger than other fighters who are able to cut down to 140. He even outmuscled Urango who is a strong dude at that weight.

At 147, he didn't have that strength advantage, and because of that he was kind of weak. I'd say about as good as Collazo as evidenced by their fight. Definately not a top10 worthy fighter.


Also, like I said above I really doubt either Oscar or Judah were in the top10 p4p list when they fought Floyd. Someone would have to provide a source on that.

 

I've got no hassle with Floyds career till he moved up from 135lbs-where he totally dominated----- but the only worthy apponents he fought after moving up were -- Oscar & Zab ---- Corley-Bruseles -Gatti - Mitchell - Baldomir - & Hatton-----all B class :smoke:smoke

and dont give me that **** about hindsight...

 

I understand what you're saying... but Collazo is no slouch and Hatton did win even though he got lucky to some degree. What Im saying is that out of 40 fights, only in the marquez fight was mayweather clearly the bigger man yet people constantly say stupid **** about him only liking to fight smaller opponents even ignoring his previous 39 fights where he was either the same size or smaller.

 

peaking?

declining.

 

Thank you! Now i know Mayweather is a wonderful human being! thanks!

 

So let me ask you this Ph|lla. Do you give floyd credit for beating Oscar,Hatton, and JMM??? a simple Yes or No would be great.

 

Preach my man, preach. Haters always give passes to the people they love for the same bull**** that they give praise to the people they hate for. haters are the biggest contradictory idiots ever. And especially floyd haters.

 

Hatton was undefeated flatout. Anytime you beat an undefeated fighter especially when he is like 40-0 is a huge ****ing deal. Cause the first person to beat floyd and take away his 40-0 is going to given the utmost credit. PERIOD!!!!

 

Ditto.
When thinking of Mayweather I think of that old early 90s R&B song, "What have you done for me lately?"