Yeah, but beating Ramirez and Edwards and surviving Rosario isn't enough for me to rank him above the likes of Buchanan, Chavez and Arguello at Lightweight, never mind the likes of Leonard, Duran, Whitaker, Gans, Canzoneri, Armstrong et al.
Point taken, the thread kind of morphed a little bit there to 'when was his prime?' Hey everything's up for debate in my book. I just think people connect his legacy with two isolated losses far too often.
Point taken, the thread took a little turn there to 'when was his prime and what was his best weight?'...well his prime, in my opinion, was undoubtedly from '84/85-'87 at LW...:yep
:blurp Yup we have another smiley face communicator... Look guys no hands:scaredas::shock::?:roll::rofl:silly:fire:hatbbb
I need not produce one. What's the need when everyone outside of yourself can see the multi-layered humor in your proposal? You've effectively shown your ignorance of boxing history yet again. This may well be your most embarassing showing, though.