The Ring Editor: "We Have Informed Pacquiao He Must Defend Next Match Or Vacate"

JMM hasn't defended in a longer time frame.

 

Pac-Valero perhaps?

 

The Palin picture made me puke!

Ring will give the title to Roger for beating up another woman, which he goes to trail for, Void has already been convicted of such, according to what I read.

 

Since he bbought it Bhop started getting his own pieve in it and ghe has his own blog on the ring's main page.. To say he has no editorial rights seems like wishful thinking.

 

Margarito/Cotto was held only a year after Margarito fought Williams and before Williams left 147.

 

Not really. Donaire hasn't beaten anyone of note at 115. It makes perfect sense unless you want them to give him a ranking based on what he's done in another weight class like ABC orgs do.

 

who the **** cares.. those pricks are taking them self too seriously. I wish someone will shut them up, they are becoming almost as annoying as ABC organizations....

Take a look at the WK- vs Chambers banner - is there ring belt mentioned? Of course, who the **** cares about it anyway!

 

pretty certain that was the IBO title.

 

Issues are always a couple months in advance.

 

paul was still a ww should they just have forgot about him.why is the ring held to such a high standard but abc get away with pure bull****:nut

 

bhops articles in the ring are brillaint and since oscar used his blog to bash manny he hasn't had one since

 

This is the correct decision. If Pacquiao has no intention of returning to 140 in the forseeable future, then of course he should have to vacate the title. Should they just let him hold it indefinitely? That would hardly be fair to the likes of Bradley and Alexander.

Some of The Ring's ratings are quite bad but on the whole, they're better than all of the ABC's. I think their belt is more prestigious than any of the alphabet organisiations (which is more of an indictment on them than anything else).

 

This is the correct decision. If Pacquiao has no intention of returning to 140 in the forseeable future, then of course he should have to vacate the title. Should they just let him hold it indefinitely? That would hardly be fair to the likes of Bradley and Alexander.

Some of The Ring's ratings are quite bad but on the whole, they're better than all of the ABC's. I think their belt is more prestigious than any of the alphabet organisiations (which is more of an indictment on them than anything else).

 

Sounds fair.