Better fighter at their peak: Miguel Cotto or Fernando Vargas

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Mar 12, 2010.


  1. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,368
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    Cotto but vargas never reached his peak
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Gotta expect a poll like this. No offense to anyone involved, but if you were following this game ten years ago like you follow it today there would be little doubt who was the superior specimen at their peak. Where is that one video with the soundbyte from Merchant comparing Vargas to Microsoft stock? Vargas was supremely skilled, had tremendous power in both hands, very good punch resistance, blurring handspeed, and knew every trick in the book. At 22 years old. Anything post Trinidad was not Fernando. The neurological damage he suffered in that fight cost him his balance, and his ability to take a solid connect. Wilfredo almost killed him with one shot in his "tuneup." Malignaggi could have rocked him after Tito got through with him.
     
  3. snakeface

    snakeface The Woodside Hurricane Full Member

    7,313
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    miguel cotto... no question.
     
  4. Old Cat

    Old Cat Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Jul 18, 2009

    THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I still can not understand what his handlers were thinking. How could they have put such a young guy in the ring with that killer......

    Fernando takes it after some thought.
     
  5. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
    :good

    I wasnt following it 10 years ago, but IMO its clear when watching both on tape..Vargas at his best was a superior fighter.so underrated now
     
  6. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
    More than anything else, this comparison displays how much better the 147-154 division was 5 - 10 years ago.

    Vargas was a very talented fighter who was in many ways incredibly unlucky to fight Trinidad early, then take on prime (or very close to) versions of mosely and de la hoya.
    His win against quartey was impressive considering, and you'd have to say he would have cleaned up mayorga if he fought him at 22, 23.

    Without a doubt if Vargas was emerging now he'd have a very bright future.
    He'd be a 10-1 favourite against a guy like yuri foreman
     
  7. darthhutchence

    darthhutchence Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,505
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vargas. Wow that was easy.
     
  8. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    While I think Cotto's peak has been longer. I think Vargas at his best was better than Cotto at his best.
     
  10. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    Cotto and Vargas were two above average fighters no more no less. Vargas was better in my opinion.
     
  11. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,956
    3,424
    Jun 30, 2005
    One theory is that Vargas's handlers were worried about his outside-the-ring troubles (he got arrested once for assaulting a guy with a golf club) so they figured they might as well move him fast before he self-destructed.
     
  12. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    I like Vargas, but damn lets stop putting Cotto or comparing him to those who have cheated in the sport:D
     
  13. Irelandsthebest

    Irelandsthebest Active Member Full Member

    1,074
    0
    Jul 5, 2009
  14. NOTINDAFACE

    NOTINDAFACE No Me Se Rajar Full Member

    2,475
    1
    Mar 22, 2010
  15. ringsider

    ringsider Active Member Full Member

    1,454
    5
    Mar 11, 2009
    Vargas was terrible......