Calzaghe versus Pavlik at 168

i think calzaghe would win a wide decision but i dont think this wouldlook like the hopkins fight at all, thats just kinda dumb. hopkins made pavlik miss and look pathetic. calzaghe would be right there for pavlik to hit and although i wouldnt pick it a ko win for pavlik is definitely in the realm of possibility. either way, calzaghe would probably end up frustrating pavlik and would rack up a wide points win

 

This is the post that made attentionwhoregnome start the thread.

Now compare this to the original post.

 

How can you call someone esle an OVERRATED JOKE while Mentioning Calzaghe in the same sentence

 

Calzaghe by decision. Boring fight anyway. Both of 'em have very ugly styles. A shame for boxing.

 

Lacy MK II

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl the bit where you entered this thread

 

Calzaghe 120-108.

 

Again. I posted fact. Tell me where what I posted is not factually correct. I'll save you time. You simply can't.

 

Kelly would KO overrated calzaghe....it wouldnt go past 8 rounds...Calzaghe is a overrated bum......

 

Calzaghe and it would not be close. Possible TKO Late

 

Calzaghe would win a wide ud.... 120-108

 

how can you tell that Calzaghe would win if you cant name 1 boxers thats worth mentioning that he beat. Kessller is his biggest win??? Jeff Lacey?? those are his greatest wins?? how can you say hes a all time great with such a weak resume??

 

I'm pretty sure Hopkins is his biggest win by a distance...

 

That´s just plane silly. what would Kellys masterplan be? To double up the jab?

 

A prime or not too faded Calzaghe completely humiliates Pavlik, a prime one knocks him out. Calzaghe was REALLY fast in his best days, faster on his feet than anyone I ever saw in that weight class. It would take a considerably faded Calzaghe to get beat by Pavlik, which certainly is always possible. Take any old boxer, and they get beat sooner or later.