ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Erik Morales or Tito Trinidad?

look both on the legendary status an could go ethier way people who dismisses tito are lame first title maurice blocker solid beat un defeated yori boy,oba carr,fernando vargas,an david reid has wins dominate over albeit not prime sweet pea ,an close fight win over oscar ,blew prime joppy out the water his three losses no shame all future hof inductees jones an hopkins naturally bigger an although beat gave solid account for himself an his set up demolishin of mayorga did nothing to prepare him for wright. now morales great super bantam with good win over zaragoza but like sweet pea alittle past it solid wins over hector acero sanchez ,wayne mcullough,one of greatest action/high skill level trilogys in rich history of boxing aginsit mab,destroyed junior jones,has credit for pac last loss great resume as well his loses david diaz ,zahir raheem,mab,an pac all solid to great fighters. both tito an erik a credit to sport an there ranking are def subject to arguments an those who say one by not close margin are full of **** .....

 

Morales by confortable decision...

 

Erik by a wide Margin...

 

I'm interested in what the PR's have to say. I vote Morales by opposition.

 

That loss to ODLH was pretty embarrassing for Tito.

 

Hopkins implicitly offered Tito a rematch after their fight.

 

That's pretty funny, all things considered.

 

Morales, but there is very little in it. Sweet_Scientist makes a compelling case for ranking Tito higher of the two, if you're interested.

 

Mo ral es.

 

Trinidad is my favorite fighter of all time, and I say Morales. Morales resume is ridiculous and IMO he has a claim to be the greatest mexican fighter of all time. Guys at smaller weight classes are chronically underrated in an atg sense for their wins, b/c the guys at higher weights are more well known.

 

Its close either way but my vote goes to Tito cause i like him more.

 

I voted Erik, PRS love Morales.