A fun fact about Wladimir Klitschko...

Nope. But Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson and the others mentioned in the opening post have, yet the OP's argument was that "Wlad has better KO ratio than Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson etc". So by posting this you confirm that Wlad having better KO ratio than those guys means absolutely nothing.

 

You better get your sarcasm detector fixed. It isn't working at all:yep

 

Damn Wlad is a hate-sink.

I don't think anyone on Earth thinks he's a perfect unbeatable fighter... But the fact is that he would KO any of you punks hating on this board...he would KTFO of me.. He would KTFO of any heavyweight fighter in the world. All you that love to hate Wlad..Just sit back and watch him boringly dominate everyone they put in front of him and keep hatin.

Yeah his style is pretty damn sleep-inducing but you don't have to be exciting to be dominant, which is exactly what he is.

You also can't sit there and say he hasn't fought anyone... He's fought EVERYONE in his era and dominated... He's not in another era, he's in THIS era. If David Haye wanted to fight Wlad they would have fought already. I've never seen anything in David Haye to suggest he has any more of an answer to Wlad than Chambers or Peter did. Haye just wanted to go get a title before he got roflstomped by Wlad. Now when he gets faceraped by either one of the Klitschkos the loss will be worth more because he's got the WBA belt.

 

All those "other guys" you mentions would KNOCK that big STIFF T.F.O.

 

You took me too seriously. I can't think rationally when it comes to the W Klit.


His best fight in my book was Corrie Sanders.:deal

 

Widdow you would make this garbage.

Wlad's resume does not tough guys like Ali, Foreman, etc. So of course he's gonna knock more people out.

I guess cause Valero has a 100% KO rate, he's the most destructive puncher of all time, right?

GET OFF WLAD'S DACK!!!

 

This content is protected

 

How the **** is he more dominant, when we have 3 champs? He hasn't taken care of Haye, Valuev or is brother therefore he is not dominant, when there are 3 champs there is NO real champ.

 

For the person who brought Tyson-Douglas, yes Tyson was hammered and schooled badly. But he stayed in there for 10 rounds too. He got knocked ring post to ring post but didn't go down 4 times after 5 minutes in there with Douglas.

Ali could have laid back on the canvas after Frazier knocked him down, quit on his stool when his jaw was broken against Norton, and he didn't.

When Wlad's been pushed to those kind of limits, he's faltered each time, except maybe Peters (I'm relatively new to boxing, still haven't watched the whole fight). I think it'll be hard for him to get much respect until he starts outclassing these bums in under 5 rounds (totally doable at this point) and/or is tested by someone, forced to get off the canvas and come back to win sensationally a la Holmes-Shavers II.

 

each time it has been stopped by the modern refs. wlad has never quit or been counted out.

 

This content is protected

 

What a refreshing break from the ******* and Joyboys.

 

Wlad´s opponents since 2005:



Eddie Chambers (never down in his career, WBO Mandatory, ranked No. 4 Ring Magzine)

Ruslan Chagaev (undefeated WBA World Champion, steps in after Haye pulls out, ranked No. 3 Ring Magazine)

Hasim Rahman (IBF Mandatory after Povetkin pulls out)

Tony Thompson (WBO Mandatory, never down before in a fight or TKO)

Sultan Ibragimov (undefeated WBO World Champion)

Lamon Brewster (Rematch, IBF Mandatory, never TKOéd before)

Ray Austin (IBF Mandatory)

Calvin Brock (undefeated)

Chris Byrd (IBF World Champion)

Samuel Peter (undefeated, IBF/WBO Eliminator)