I have one question for you guys: If boxing appreciates boxers, then how did Manny...

So beating Dlh at 147, and Hatton along with asking Cotto to come in at 145 and beating Clottey gives Pac FOTD over Floyd lol... Gotcha!!!

 

LOL Whatchu know about the Doctor, Nallege?

 

He is the most exciting fighter ever. I don't appreciate defensive boring boxers.

 

This content is protected

 

No, you don't get it. Blood testing is better than urine and there is proof of that being factual. Yet and still we heard Top Rank give more excuses than a prostitute in church as to why they wouldn't comply. That is the point.

 

That's not even a saying...

 

The decade didn't end in '07 when Floyd retired. Obviously, Manny continued fighting and piled up enough points to overtake Floyd just before the decade ended.

 

What a ****. By mexican greats I assume you mean Morales, Barrera, and Marquez. Pac didn't beat Marquez until 08, a year after Floyd retired. So basically your argument that no one was ranking Pacquiao over Floyd for these wins makes no sense because one of the wins had yet to happen.

 

What proof are you talking about? How many were caught ion blood tests? Urine? So which is more effective then?

One advantage of blood is because it can be stored and checked later using better testing methods. Drugs that are not being tested against currently (e.g. A-meth) may be tested better in the future. This is a detriment for athletes because it means even using designer currently undetectable drugs isn't totally safe for WADA may test their blood positive in the future.

It's been mentioned in a thread that testing blood is also cheaper.

 

Its nobodies fault but Mayweather`s own IMO.

He had fighter of the decade all but wrapped up when he retired after the Hatton fight... he never imagined that Pacquiao - judging by previous form & achievements - would be able to surpass him before 2010... even at that, if Mayweather didnt retire & kept racking up wins in those 2 yrs, he would have remained ahead of Pacquiao & won the vote.

The only thing he can do now is beat Mosely & Pac himself... that will be enough to get him ranked as at least the best fighter of his era, certainly since Whitaker/Chavez.

 

op

 

Yeah, keep assuming.

 

There is no fault. We all know who the best boxer of the decade is/was lol...

 

Your boy has been beaten 3 times(two by 3 round ko)...and all of you @#!@$! *******s say PAc's prime didn't start until he beat EM in the rematch lol... Pac wasn't rated over floyd even after fighting the big 3, and all of a sudden YOU think Pac's resume is shitting all over Floyd's now lol...

 

Hahaha who else could you have meant? Solis? Larios? Velazquez???

Back to your question: "Before Floyd retired, why was PAc not ranked ahead of Floyd pfp if those 3 Mexican greats made PAc's resume so much greater than Floyd's as all of you *******s claim lol... Why was Pac not ranked higher than Floyd???"

Because no one rates wins that haven't happened yet you mong.