Mikkel Kessler in all likely hood is going to be a 4 time super middleweight champion

And Kessler helt 2 of them and challenged Calzaghe for the third (technically also the fourth since Calzaghe dropped the IBF belt to fight Manfredo). You are undermining your own arguments...

 

oh do STFU, do you ever give credit to non American boxers

 

You are the one saying the SMW division is weak not me. And again you neglect to acknowledge the fact that Kessler held the WBA and WBC and tried to unify against Calzaghe.

 

Beyer was champ when Kessler beat him... If he beats Froch then he will have beaten another champ...

 

Siaca was the WBA champ as well. Sartison is the only time Kessler collected a belt without beating a titleholder. Meanwhile, Cotto has collected 3 belts across 2 divisions without beating a single champion.

 

Yeah you're right Reg. I actually to this day thought the fight was for the vacated belt, but Siaca apparatly won that belt of Mundine. Well wadda ya know you learn something everyday

 

alphabet soup, man
the only time kessler was actually viewed as lineal champ was in the vacuum created by calzaghe's withdrawal - i don't think that's unjust.
froch successfully defended his title against taylor and dirrell, so that will definitely be kessler's best victory if he gets it.

 

Honestly, I can't complain about Kessler's comp. He's done pretty well considering what he's had to work with.

 

:huh

 

MW if you're a Ward fan why would you make a thread trying to discredit Kessler as a fighter and his credentials?

 

Pathetic thread trying to discredit a fighter who has ducked no one.