Dan Rafael scoring a...

fight is an adventure. He had the Pavlik vs. Martinez fight close. Froch beating Dirrell and Calzaghe losing to Hopkins. He is terrible and thank goodness he doesn't make a living judging fights.

 

Martinez clearly won the fight,i thought he won by around 4 rounds,I thought Direll nicked the Froch fight but it could have gone either way and i thought hopkins and clazaghe was very close with Calzaghe just nicking it...

 

Dan is only good for boxing news updates. His opinion and scoring are full of bias and arrogance

 

Is bad as Dan may be, Teddy Atlas is the worse fight scorer in history.

 

:deal Spot on. He gets the breaking news but his analysis of fights is ****.

 

Martinez won by 4 clear rounds, it was relatively easy to score.

 

He also had Ruiz beating Toney

 

only one i bad
pav got schooled 4-5 rounds up martinez

froch - dirrel is close cant complain who got it

calzaghe - hopkins was close and on first viewing i scored it hopkins aswell

 

Of course he is garbage, he had Floyd dominating DLH :-(

 

Hopkins won close, Dirrell dominated, and Martinez won by a landslide.

 

I had Floyd beating Oscar 9 rounds to 3. I have yet to come across an unbias person who had it any closer than 8-4 Floyd.

 

Thats because if someone doesnt see it the way you see it, that means they are biased.

 

By close, what was his score?

 

I had Hopkins up by 1 point against Calzaghe, I guess it could've gone either way.

Froch-Dirrell could've gone either way too.

 

Dan Rafael fills a lot of space in sports journalism.
He can really throw his weight around and flatten anyone who gets in his way.