1. Pacquiao 2. Mayweather 3. Dawson 4. Mosley 5. W. Klitschko 6. Calderon 7. J.M. Marquez 8. Hopkins <---He drops a few spots but not off the list completely 9. V. Klitschko 10. Martinez (11. P. Williams)
Looks like a decent list to me. I disagree with a lot of it but, none of it is absurd. Where is your list, smart guy?:?
Untill Hayeboy actually steps in the ring with either two of the giants, I always would have him lower than either Klitschko. Beating Barret, Valuev and Ruiz were good achievements but far from great in comparisson with the opposition Klitschko bro's faced (with the exception of Johnson or (debateble) Sosnowski). The only top 10 he faced was Valuev and as we all know, not because he was that good but freaked himself a portion of the belt...
Ah... your 2011 predcitions indicate Pac wins a seat in congress and is therefore retired from boxing. Hint: he's not winning in the elections.
1. mayweather 2. pac-man 3. mosley 4. hopkins 5. dawson 6. wladimir 7. marquez 8. vitali 9. williams 10. martinez
How is Floyd Mayweather Number 1 ?? I will NEVER be a fan of Manny Pacquiao,But that number 1 spot belongs to him and him only
When you guys do your P4P, do you rank all heavyweight fighters as in effect being of equal weight? Or if Wlad is 235 and Haye is 215, even though you think Wlad is a better overall fighter, you rank Haye ahead of Wlad on a P4P basis? Whilst waiting for some answers there, I would suggest that just as we don't quibble over whether one Super Middleweight is a bit lighter than another Super Middleweight, that if your division is Heavyweight, then in the P4P rankings, you get no "bonus points" for being lighter than other Heavyweights in your division.
Do you have a good reason for that or are you just hanging on Haye's sack? I bet you would rank Haye up there wouldn't you? You can and SHOULD rank both Klitschko's on the top 10 p4p list because no matter how much they weigh, they keep knocking everyone out.