Andre Dirrell Is Really Undefeated...

The way he fought against Froch, he deserves one.

 

****, I forgot about that one. Dman that was terrible.

All that said I was really impressed with the Abraham fight.

 

Dirrell "IS" undefeated

He took Both Froch 0 and AA 0

 

sore loser........

 

Tough luck....
he lost to Froch in a close fight.
Close enough that the one actually consistently pressing the action should have one.

Also, Froch exploited the times Dirrell clinched to land solid shots. Dirrell looked SHOCKED that Froch was punching him in the clinch.

 

No that would be Froch

Cause he def looked like one at the end of the fight

He knew he lost that fight

His face said it all

 

I don't understand why people make such a big deal about the "0". Dirrell took a risk by walking into the lion's den to take on the champ. He didn't have the best game plan but he's learnt from that experience and has already gone on to better things. I have alot more respect for fighters who take a risk like that and lose, than I do for the ***** holes who do everything they can to protect their "0".

 

I agree with AGM.

 

Direll lost and cant have any real complaints he fought a horrible boring fight and set out to steal a title and the fact that he feels he was robbed himself is really poetic justice. That said in the long run it proved to be a good thing for him because he realised he needs to show much more ambition and fought an excellent fight against AA

 

in my eyes, yes.

 

No, he didn't.

I can state as an absolute, 100%, stone-walled fact, that Dirrell didn't take Froch's "0".

Unless you saw an alternative ending, the scores were :

Alejandro Rochin Mapula 113-114 | judge: Massimo Barrovecchio 115-112 | judge: Daniel Van de Wiele 115-112

In favour of Carl Froch.

 

If you believe he has no loss thats fine. Too many people scream robbery but then accept the fighters official stats.

I personally think Martinez has only 1 loss and 1 draw. Robberies are disgusting enough without being legitamised by the fans.

Eg, if you think Lewis was robbed in the first Holyfield fight, do not comment that Holyfield drew. He only drew in the eyes of incompetant judges.

 

I am not a big fan of the guy, but I agree that he should be undefeated. His fight against Froch was close and at times hard to score, but I had Dirrell winning by, I believe two points. I still want to score that fight again.

 

Dirrell didn't actually do anything in order to win the fight. You need to fight in order to win a fight.