Call Interpol,a major robbery has taken place.

What? It was a close fight but I had Kessler winning, no robbery whatsoever! Just like Froch got the nod over Dirrel in Nottingham. The score card was wrong but maybe he liked that Kessler was going forward and taking the fight to Froch.

 

Froch was dominant????? Take a nap buddy

 

Joke thread me thinks

 

It wasn't anything like a robbery. The rounds were hard fought, but Kessler won that fight 8-4 or 7-5.

 

tit - fair fight froch lost, simple as

 

You're just kidding, right?

 

:rofl:rofl Get off Froch's nuts!

 

Froch didnt school him in ****!!! Maybe in how to block a punch with ur nosebone or how to het ur ass whupped but that was it. Froch is ****, tough as nails and just as dense..

 

To be fair that card was a joke. I had at least 5 Froch rounds and some were close. Had it a draw.

 

Totally agree with the TS. Froch was fuggin' robbed.

 

If you are serious in what you said. You need to have your head checked. Kessler undoubtedly won that fight, anyone who says otherwise has no clue about boxing.

 

What were the two biggest?

Lacey losing to Calzaghe and Pavlik losing to Hopkins perhaps?

 

There was no way Carl was going to win that fight.Those scorecards were filled last Wednesday so basically he was screwed from the begining.

In a way he had the wrong strategy,there was no reason why he had to fight on the backfoot.It's not his style.If he had been fighting his usual come forward style he would have put away that guy by round 6.Everytime Froch went forward he did damage.I'm not sure whatever injury he had ,maybe it affected him

 

37 years and still don't know how to watch a fight. That's shameful. You might need glasses.