Light - Heavyweight History Hd 2 Hd debate

Okay seen as though Sugar seems offline lets do it. Any thoughts?

 

I'm here now mate. Moore-Loughran then?

 

awww
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AH7e3qK0EA[/ame]

 

Haha, why don't you get involved in the thread? You're welcome like.

 

I'll give a little insight then. I have no doubt that Loughran is capable of beating Moore, it's just that it's only fair and proper to consider the best version of both. Moore could find himself on the end of Loughran's great jab and when trying to force himself under it/picking it off etc his attacks might get countered. Moore is the better fighter and has more tools imo, but Loughran might be the most effective pure boxer the division ever saw.

Yourself?

 

Be my guest!

 

Yeah, as much as i really enjoy watching Moore on the outside i've got to favour Loughran in a boxing match. He just doesn;t give anything away. That said, i've read that Tunney used judgement of distance to get the better of Loughran. On the outside, Moore feints so well, bobs, weaves, keeps probing for openings and creates and exploits them in the process, it's great to watch from a technical point of view. Loughran though, with his defensive frame of mind would be constantly jabbing whilst Moore does this, annoying him and provoking his man to launch attacks, Loughran wants you to do that, he just steps aside and you run into nothing.

It would be interesting to see if Moore could counter the jab with that oh so great right hand he posessed, it would undoubtedly have some success.

Do you edge towarda anybody?

Anyone else got any views?

 

I've got to say a lot of people would disagree there, on Loughran never fighting anyone as good as Moore that is. Gre and Tunney were two of the best ever at this poundage. There's some speculation on Tunney not being quite what he is heralded as, but i don;t buy that personally. Greb might have the best resume in and around the weight himself actually, though he is regarded higher at middle.

Anyhow, i think i'm leaning towards Loughran. It's about time we disagreed anyway, it only makes for healthy debate which is what this is about. I just keep thinking that there's no bona fide way to beat Moore, as it can apparently be done more than one way. For instance Burley outboxed him using hard shots and Charles apparently outfought him. My only beef with picking Loughran is that Moore has more tools and if he can implement them to effect can Loughran deal with it?

I'm not really ready to decide yet though. I'm not convinced i've observed this from all angles, you?