Carl Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 26, 2010.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,670
    21,961
    Sep 15, 2009
    the funny thing is, he believes he has an elusive style that is hard to hit lol. i cant believe how low he holds his hands also.

    i hope he gets a rematch wiith both dirrell and kessler in the semis/final
     
  2. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    :lol: This ^
     
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Drew Dirrell, Beat Kessler.

    If the point-deduction didn't happen I think I would have had Dirrell up.
     
  4. TOMCAT

    TOMCAT Member Full Member

    254
    0
    Apr 15, 2009
    Based on clean effective punching... I think Dirrell won. He simlply outlanded Froch and did sadly make him look very clumsy at times.

    However, as many ppl think, Direll walked the line between boxing on the back foot and running away. At times, he was certainly running away. He didn't take the title from Froch.

    I has Kessler winning by 2 points on the night but having watched it twice again since then.. I score it for Froch by 1 round. He lands the more effective punches in the close rounds.. though he is on the back foot most of the night and a bit lazy early on.

    Neither result was a robbery though. Press were mixed in both fights.. Hard to score.
     
  5. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
    I think you dont know what the hell you're talking about as usual.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,670
    21,961
    Sep 15, 2009
    hard to score indeed! if you take out all the swing rounds from both fights, you have very few rounds of boxing left!
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,670
    21,961
    Sep 15, 2009
    so you had froch losing both fights? lmao please, please dont bring "you know who" into this thread :deal
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,670
    21,961
    Sep 15, 2009
    you have miccoli in ya avatar? which team you support? miccoli was an awesome player 5 year ago but i dont really rate him these days
     
  9. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
    Where in this thread did i said i had Froch losing both fights *******?
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,670
    21,961
    Sep 15, 2009
    you said i dont know what im talking about lol. what did i not know if it werent froch winning? and please dont call me an *******!
     
  11. TOMCAT

    TOMCAT Member Full Member

    254
    0
    Apr 15, 2009
    Very true!

    I reckon Froch can beat AA.. Outwork him. He seriusly needs to put his hands up though. Everyone else can land flush on Froch, AA will be no different! Then again, he's got that granite chin... hmmmm.

    Gonna be a really tense night for a Froch fan!
     
  12. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    I think he lost them both, narrowly to Dirrell but I had it pretty wide for Kessler.

    I wouldn't worry too much about Calzaghe's fans opinion, if someone is any more than indifferent to the likes of Calzaghe then imo they don't even like what boxing is supposed to be about.
     
  13. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    he lost to kessler and beat dirrell - **** me i did that from memory, didn't even need to boxrec it.
     
  14. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    I had Froch winning the Dirrell fight 7-5, but you would have a strong case for a draw.

    I had Froch drawing with Kessler, but you would have a strong case for Froch.

    I think two draws would be the fairest decisions.
     
  15. Zandman

    Zandman Fisticuffs Fan Full Member

    512
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    I don't know, but do you guys consider ring generalship at all when you score rounds?
    I know opinions differ, and some close rounds might go both ways and all that, but Kessler really owned that ring, and constantly kept Froch on the defensive. You could clearly see it was HIS fight all the way, and that counts for a lot when a fight is scored.
    Not that it matters much, but I bet you'd see that generalship reflected in CompuBox numbers, if they should ever surface.

    Generalship is what gave Froch the victory agains Dirrell, btw, more so than any home advantage. I actually scored it for Dirrell, but I do understand and accept that it didn't go his way. You don't win a belt by being chased around the ring all night by a stonger man.