Would Pac vs May decide who the best fighter of this generation is?

41 have tried...

 

See Addie this is what is a little frustrating when talking boxing with some people. If Mayweather beats the crap out of Pac, he will still be number 2 in your eyes. What does he have to do to be number 1? Their resumes are close to equal and Pac has proved that 147 may be his best fighting weight.

You're trying to say that Mayweather beating Pac in his prime doesn't mean anything?

Winner HAS to be considered the best fighter of this era.

 

If you mean for 2000 and forward then yes, most people have Floyd and Pac @ the top fighters today, a fight between the two should finally end the debate of who is really
the best fighter.

 

This is where we differ.

I think Manny has a significant advantage in terms of resume

 

Fair enough and this has been debated a million times so no point arguing. We both believe what we believe.

If Pac beats Floyd, I'll be in here praising him as one of the best of all time. I am just hopeful that Pac fans will do the same for Floyd if he wins. Otherwise, they might as well not even fight.

 

Floyd is def. the best of the last decade...but that will all change when he's looking up at the lights after a barrage of hooks from Pacman.

 

:good Pacquiao is already one of the best of all time, but we can't get any fairer than that.

Goodluck to both combatants.

 

And so is mayweather who unlike pac remains underfeated in this era, pac has lost 3 times and drawn twice. Not good enough.:bart

 

If you *******s think a guy with no jab, short arms, **** poor defense and limited will beat a elite technician like PBF you're kidding yourself. People like you who don't look at the technical aspects of boxing will forever be left looking stupid in the end. PBF is the best most complete fighter Pac has ever faced. He's juts as fast if not faster and is just as athletic but he's longer and stronger he's also a counter puncher makes few mistakes and is the best defensive fighter of this era combined with a being a ring general with a high IQ. You have a recipe for disaster for Pac but you still don't see it. It amazes me that guys like you can be so blind even when staring in the face of defeat. Historically speaking elite defensive counter punchers like PBF have owned elite aggressive pressure fighters like Pac but I guess that doesn't matter either? Offense sells tickets but defense wins championships and come fight night you'll find this out but by then it will be too late

 

Roy in his hey day was the greatest fighter I've ever seen in my life time. Yall must of 4got. Like some other guy said that was in the 90's and early 2000's. Floyd and Pac are neck and neck in a sence. I still don't see how Pac is still number 1 p4p on some people's list, but it is what it is. We'l get all the answer's with no excuses when or if they finally meet, but if Floyd put a whooping on Pac there's gonna be a line longer than a unemployment line as to why he loss the fight and so badly. SOme 1 will be bold enough to mention a size disadvantage, then Pac was doing his political run.

 

Watch more Boxing and less of Mayweather's incoherent and uneducated interviews.

Ray Leonard lost multiple times...he's a BUM!!!

 

Boxings most accurate quote:
"undefeated means you haven't fought anyone"

 

Pac and May are about the same age.

If Pac fought the 41 fights that Mayweather did at the times he did, what do you think his record would be?

 

41-0?
Easily?

Oh sorry, and with a much higher knockout %.