Pac started the decade really well actually. From 2000 to 2003 he went undefeated with all his wins by way of knockout and championships in 2 divisions, one lineal by destroying a prime ATG.
Barrera was probably just past his prime but more expereinced than at his peak and he did very well after pac destroyed him aswell, and of course he is an ATG
You're the Filipino version of freddy-wak. EDIT - I take that back, you're worse. If I had to guess over 85% of your post are about Pac. The other 15% or so, is with Donaire or things closely linked to Pac.
Beating up low skilled busted corner beaten by Mayweather Hatton? Beating up previously beaten by Mayweather skeletal ODLH? Beating up destroyed busted corner Cotto? Pass the rose colored glasses. :roll:
To me Mayweather deserved it hands down. He's had dominating displays (KO or not) against pretty much anybody he faced. Definitely the better boxer of any other boxer in the running and still remains unbeaten.
It really is a toss up IMO regardless to what people say Floyd has dominated for ten years and on the other hand manny has made some big moves. People will argue floyds opposition and people will argue that manny has been catered to by arum in regards to his historic rise. I personally would probably had a co award because i could make a valid argument for both as to why they each deserve it and why they each do not deserve it.
No pac is a hall of famer and boxer of the decade. It's funny how he always brings up that pac got KO'd twice. That happened in the 90's and since the morales loss, he has won 12 straight fight against the likes of morales-barrera-marquez-delahoya-hatton-cotto and clottey. That's pretty damn impressive.