Jack Johnson in the 1970's...?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Jun 8, 2010.


  1. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    14
    Dec 27, 2006
    I think that he would've beat guys like scott ledoux, chuck wepner and tex cobb quite handily.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,481
    Feb 15, 2006
    How disarmingly generous of you.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,481
    Feb 15, 2006
    The irony of what you are saying, is that the heavyweights of today are probably the worst pure athletes that have boxed at world level in any era.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    24,962
    8,668
    Jul 15, 2008
    I have the same concerns about Johnson .. he would have to be far more aggressive than I ever saw him on film ...
     
  5. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    471
    Oct 6, 2004
    Good, So you agree, at the very least, Johnson and Ketchell for that matter was better than a shot Holyfield. By default, then I guess you also agree that they were both better than Oquenda, Botha, Savarese and probably Valuev.

    Career middleweight? He was a light heavyweight at 23 years of age when he fought Johnson and he was tragically killed at just 24. Incidentally, since i am on holyfield at the moment, if he died at 24, he would have been a career light heavyweight!
    Not me personally, but Nino Benvenutti seems to think that Carlos Monzon decked Joe Frazier. Is that close enough?
     
  6. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    471
    Oct 6, 2004

    Well i will give Wlad one thing, he certainly is brave, in that scenario. He is putting himself in line for a shot at prime Jack Dempsey!

    I wonder if he will take his warm up fight against Jess Willard. 6 6 1/2 - 250lbs. Should be interesting. Unlike Johnson, Wladimir has never faced anyone bigger than himself! He made his reputation fighting fighters smaller than him with limited boxing skills and stamina.

    It is also interesting that he picked 1920 to land the time machine. Is it a coincidence that Jack Johnson was in jail at the time?
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,481
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,193
    42,116
    Feb 11, 2005
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,481
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007
    Not only this, but Johnson's chin would be an issue in the 70's. If Ketchel could floor Johnson, cause him to roll over, and brace himself to get up, then what happens if Frazier or Foreman hit him? The same goes for Lyle or Shavers.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,193
    42,116
    Feb 11, 2005
     
  12. DocDevil

    DocDevil Member Full Member

    420
    8
    Jul 30, 2006
    JacK Johnson has been considered by many an all time great.But from 1970 to 75 there were many who would put the Galveston Giant to the test.Frazer,Foreman Ali, and Quarry have been mentioned.But awkward durable fighters, like Chuvalo and Bonavena could cause problems for Johnson,along with boxer jimmy Ellis and slugger Mac Foster. In 1970, Jack Johnson would barely miss fighting older Sonny Liston,but the very well perserved Floyd Patterson would be up to the challenge.Johnson would be pushed by all of these guys.
     
  13. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,448
    Jan 6, 2007
    Good post ....remember Ring Mag. Nat Fleischer had Jack Johnson No. 1 and he might have been right.
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Wladimir Klitschko TKO 11 Vitali Klitschko
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,481
    Feb 15, 2006