foreman:calzaghes a so-so fighter.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by warrior85, Nov 10, 2007.


  1. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
  2. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    But in all serious "maybe he would get his dues" implies he is good then he calls him "so-so"?
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    what Foreman means is that Calzaghe is not recognized as a great fighter even though he should be.

     
  4. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,090
    Jul 19, 2004
    i think the headline was taken out of context to the rest of the post.

    basically george is saying calzaghe is not famous in america because he is not american.

    i agree and the exact could be said about mayweather in the uk compared to hatton.
     
  5. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    he made some valid points.but a so-so fighter?no way.
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    He's right. Calzaghe can not be called an ATG with that **** poor resume. Simple as. Talent? Possibly. Resume? Not a chance.

    Calzaghe's three best wins are over a "good" Kessler, a "mediocre" Lacy and a "shot" Eubank.

    He is not an ATG and will never be known as one. Dominating a division is fine, but, like Bernard Hopkins, he has not beaten one great opponent. Therefore, there is no logic behind calling him an ATG.



    "So-so" is a ridiculous comment though. Calzaghe is far more than that, but he is right in sayng Calzaghe is not a great.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    and yet BHOP ranks highly in every single ATG list.
     
  8. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007

    watch it he'll grill ya!:D
     
  9. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    He's not a top 50 fighter. Therefore, not an ATG. I could list 50 fighters with a better resume than him, with ease.

    When your best win is over a mediocre fighter like Antonio Tarver, you aren't an ATG.
     
  10. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    id personally say his best win was over tito but then again tito was 13pds over his best weight so its all a matter of opinion.
     
  11. southjaw

    southjaw New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    Why does everyone say Eubank was shot? He was 31?!
     
  12. Big Ears

    Big Ears Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,274
    0
    Jun 5, 2005
    and gave Carl Thompson two really good fights for the Cruiserweight title after that .

    He wasn't prime , but he wasn't shot either .
     
  13. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    joe is just so-so until he steps up and faces a true elite fighter then he will never get the worldwide recognition his fans crave. look at kosta tszyu as a prime example he ended his career never facing one true elite fighter in any weightclass and he is and never will be considered an ATG.
     
  14. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  15. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Eubank hadn't had a good, decisive win in years. He looked slow, lacked power and agility. His footwork was poor and even his chin started to wear away. Maybe "shot" was harsh, but he wasn't close to being in his prime.

    Amuse me. When was the last time Eubank beat a good opponent clearly before the Calzaghe fight?