People who picked Mosley to win should be ashamed. What were you thinking exactly?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by China_hand_Joe, Nov 10, 2007.


  1. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Greatâ„¢ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    good thing i rooted for Cotto to win...i also won 750 vBookie pts lol
     
  2. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Graet! Just what ESB needs. Another racist piece of crap!:patsch
     
  3. koko of phil

    koko of phil Ring of Fire Resident Full Member

    2,246
    0
    Mar 20, 2005
    I think I was wrong too picking Mosley to win on this, he did'nt come out the way I expected but he had some moments in the fight. I don't give all to Cotto who some would think way leading over the old Sugar, the Puerto Rican just looked impressive in the later rounds. IMO a Draw should have resulted, it's a close fight.
     
  4. justsightseeing

    justsightseeing New Member Full Member

    74
    0
    Nov 10, 2007

    You must of been smoking crack last night. So I will give you a pass for your mental ******ation. Name one thing that Mosley did more effective then Cotto. Ask yourself this, who landed the cleaner harder shots, who won the battle of jabs which you HAVE to win to be considered the better boxer. Who landed more counter punches. Cotto scored with clean power shots all fight. Mosleys punches was little bull**** grab hold and throw meaningles body punches to look good for compubox. If you had a half a brain and watched the fight Cotto decidingly went backwards and STILL landed more punches on Shane.
     
  5. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Nobody has yet came up with a way in which Mosley could have performed better and could have won the fight, nor a way Cotto could have performed much worse having just gone onto the backfoot late on.

    It is time to admit it was an awful pick, otherwise you'll never learn from your mistakes. It is negative feedback, learn from it. A hamster is capable of learning from negative feedback, why aren't you?
     
  6. badger6

    badger6 Ask your wife !!! Full Member

    1,211
    0
    May 6, 2007
    At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter what anyone here says. COTTO WON, PERIOD.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    All you did was pick Cotto. Big whup...it's a 50-50 pick. Maybe if you would have given a fight break down or say HOW you thought Cotto would win, that would give you something to brag about. Anyone can pick a winner from two people...but not everyone can break a fight down. Congrats on the coin going your way...:roll:
     
  8. willnav

    willnav New Member Full Member

    85
    0
    Jan 21, 2006
    Stop whining cotto won clearly.:patsch Watch it again.
     
  9. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    It wasn't a 50/50 pick. It was a 95/5 pick.

    I don't deserve credit for my pick it was easy and my 100% prediction record was under no threat here, but anyone picking Mosley deserves either ridicule or psychiatric help.

    It was a totally illogical pick and is unforgivable.
     
  10. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    Mosley could have won had he entered with a better game plan.....the fact that he underestimated Cotto shocked him in the ring and then he looked confused a little.....if yo watch Mosley tried to start bouncing on his toes after the first couple rounds trying to find a rhythym after Cotto started feeding him healthy jabs that he wasn't ready for. If you listen after the fight he was shocked Cotto actually outboxed him. Mosley should never had thought Cotto was a one way fighter because thats how he tried to fight him when he found out Cotto couold actually box he couldnt figure him out because Cotto kept him moing witht he Jab a very solid jab.
     
  11. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Cotto demonstrated that jab against Judah and a fwew dozen other fighters. Mosley simply didn't have the reflexes or skill to do anything about the evitable, quality jab.
     
  12. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    point taken...you make a good point about Mosley not having the reflexes he used to.....i still think that jab in this fight is all worlds better and played a even bigger role in winning this fight.
     
  13. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    In the first few rounds against Collazo, it was apparent Mosley has become very hitable.

    I was in absolute shock when I saw the fight odds. I thought the bookies would have gone for 2/1 or 2.5/1 against Mosley, maybe even 3/1.
     
  14. Devilface2

    Devilface2 .... Full Member

    234
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    The cut was caused by a head butt, moron.
     
  15. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    What the **** does ***** ass Floyd do, yet mother ****ers won't be sayin that **** when he runs?

    Besides, Cotto counterpunched the **** out of Shane when he was coming in, knocking his head back with a jab that was ****in POWER SHOT.