no. let it go. Cotto is good but not great. ffs. he basically lost to Clottey as well. stop making excuses - it's embarrassing.
There's never been any proof of Pac using steroids so you can't put and asterix next his victory over Cotto. The Margo fight however will always be suspicious in my mind. I just can't understand why he would load his gloves for the Mosley fight but not do it for the Cotto fight, when Cotto was the man in the division at the time and held a recent victory over Mosley.
Clottey beat Cotto - but didn't compete the last 2 rounds because he's an idiot. Anyone can see that.
because everytime cotto loses there's always some excuse. keep up, there's a good lad. Cotto could lose his next ten fights but there'll still be some douchebag saying he's unbeaten because of 'something didn't count'. meh.
Well, it's hard not to praise a classy guy like him unlike Pac and Mayweather...I understand where you're coming from though.
I scored the fight 114-113 to Cotto, with the KD in round 1 making the difference. I actually give Cotto big props for that fight considering he had a horrific cut above his eye from round 3 (or was it 4?) onwards. Off the top of my head i think I gave Cotto the 1st (10-8 round), 3rd, 6th, 10th, 11th and 12th.
I really like Cotto and love to watch his fights. I don't give a damn if there is absolute proof either cheated him. I believe they did. Too damn suspicious. Would Cotto have beaten them both if they weren't cheats? Yes, I think it would be likely.