Name a fighter who was technically perfect

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Aug 9, 2010.


  1. WhamBam

    WhamBam Keeping Cool Full Member

    2,134
    0
    Jul 30, 2010
    its a shame he couldnt capitalise against fighters like arguello, Chacon and edwards who were far from technically sound
     
  2. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    True. Textbook is always the first thing that springs to mind when talking about technically great fighters for me aswell to be fair.

    In terms of pure textbook fighters, hard to me to look past the likes of Harold Johnson and Bernard Hopkins.
     
  3. justcause

    justcause Sword of Justice Full Member

    394
    0
    Jul 18, 2010
  4. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006
    Salvador Sanchez

    :happy:happy:happy
     
  5. HyperUppercut

    HyperUppercut Atheists,u'll get da shit Full Member

    1,546
    0
    Jul 14, 2010
    :patsch:patsch:patsch I'm sure you have seen Oscar's "package".
     
  6. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,540
    Mar 16, 2008
  7. RealBoxing

    RealBoxing Kill The Nonsense Full Member

    2,783
    0
    Feb 15, 2009

    I can see your point. :good

    Its really in no particular order, but yeah those came
    to mind right away.
     
  8. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    +1 for Winky. His fight with Trinidad was a thing of beauty and still one of my favorite fights.

    Wlad is another one.
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnkwCM5_TjY[/ame]


    Like most of the fighters here, had areas where he get less than textbook and occasional flaws(mainly that he didn't always turn his straight puncher over all the way), as well as not being a top physical talent overall, but as far as the skillset he had mastered and had to draw from in fights, he was very complete from both a textbook and technical perspective.
     
  10. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    It's pretty hard to rate Jones technically because there is no way you can fault him. Pretty much everything he did, was as close to perfection as you'll find in any history book. The thing is though, he's so far away from what is supposed to be good technical ability, how do you fairly rate him? He did everything right or nothing right, depending on how you look at it.

    Don Curry was a good call.
     
  11. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Vernon Forrest, Mike McCallum were technically good fighters.
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    gene tunny is a great choice:good
     
  13. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    good analysis on jones. textbook no, but what he did do was as close to perfect as posssible

    as for wlad, think he's a great choice:thumbsup
     
  14. swe6826

    swe6826 Guest

    Orzubek Nazarov is another boxer who struck me as a very methodical type boxer.
     
  15. pedoro gomez

    pedoro gomez eliqueiros is the coolest Full Member

    130
    0
    Jul 24, 2010
    The guy in my avatar.